Active Users:658 Time:15/03/2026 01:14:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom Send a noteboard - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM
The question was regarding consensual incest. Children are not capable (by law) of consenting and so they are not covered by the question. The question was made with respect to adult-adult incest only.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Some legal questions. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 716 Views
Yes to both Maria - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 474 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. Rebekah - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 462 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. Macharius - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 436 Views
Incest with children is outside the scope of the question posed. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:38:39 PM 413 Views
Who brought children into it? Tim - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 429 Views
No and depends snoopcester - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 465 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 415 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 417 Views
Re: No and depends Macharius - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 413 Views
Re: No and depends snoopcester - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 378 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 396 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 176 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. Joel - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 423 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. Tom - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 423 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. Joel - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 393 Views
How? Why? Tom - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 427 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 376 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life. Joel - 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM 464 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tom - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 448 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 403 Views
Of course a corpse is property. Tom - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 426 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. Tim - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 495 Views
Strangely Camilla - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 361 Views
consensual necrophilia? moondog - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 419 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? Rebekah - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 387 Views
no to both random thoughts - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 419 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. Tim - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 412 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong random thoughts - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 407 Views
Hm? nossy - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 419 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* ironclad - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 181 Views
Interesting... globug0822 - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 405 Views
yes to both *NM* Aisha - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 161 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Novo - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 416 Views
Re: Some legal questions. Darth_Katie - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 422 Views
hhmmmm mick - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 393 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes