I take much less issue with someone donating their dead body to a necrophiliac than I do with incest. Granted, I would have less issue with incest if it were a case of a brother and sister growing up in different areas, and then meeting later in life (and not having babies).
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Some legal questions.
- 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM
687 Views
Yes to both
- 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM
446 Views
No and depends
- 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM
434 Views
Re: No and depends
- 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM
386 Views
Re: No and depends
- 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM
388 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent.
- 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM
372 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM*
- 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM
165 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family.
- 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM
394 Views
You're confusing two separate issues.
- 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM
396 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well.
- 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM
363 Views
How? Why?
- 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM
400 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized.
- 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM
344 Views
And I certainly don't think consensual incest should brand someone a sexual predator for life.
- 12/01/2011 07:20:32 PM
431 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
- 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM
419 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers.
- 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM
376 Views
Strangely
- 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM
329 Views
no to both
- 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM
389 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is.
- 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM
383 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong
- 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM
375 Views
