Active Users:680 Time:18/12/2025 07:03:05 PM
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. Joel Send a noteboard - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM
If you start a fight in a bar and break someone's arm it is criminal because you've just committed a trespass against an individual. A corpse is not an individual. It WAS an individual, but it's just a big sack of meat and bones that is slowly decomposing.

There is no criminal charge corresponding to intentional infliction of emotional distress in most situations (one exception is menacing).

Hence they can do things like claim the deceased personal effects and inherit their property. It seems odd to think the coroner commits a crime if he swipes Aunt Tillys TV when he comes to collect her, but not if he slips her something just as stiff as she it.

You're the lawyer, not I, so I'm not going to presume to say I know your profession better, but, whether or not that's the way it is, it doesn't seem the way it SHOULD be. Of course, you know as well as I that how things should be is a lot less relevant to the law than most people probably think it is.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Some legal questions. - 12/01/2011 06:16:23 PM 700 Views
Yes to both - 12/01/2011 06:31:14 PM 459 Views
Incest isn't necessarily about children. - 12/01/2011 06:33:20 PM 445 Views
Re: Incest isn't necessarily about children. - 12/01/2011 06:57:10 PM 418 Views
Who brought children into it? - 12/01/2011 11:04:12 PM 411 Views
No and depends - 12/01/2011 06:44:02 PM 446 Views
Re: No and depends - 12/01/2011 07:01:35 PM 398 Views
Re: No and depends - 13/01/2011 10:08:15 AM 401 Views
Re: No and depends - 13/01/2011 01:47:54 PM 399 Views
Re: No and depends - 13/01/2011 03:01:42 PM 362 Views
No and yes, because of the issue of consent. - 12/01/2011 07:11:31 PM 383 Views
Only people can provide consent. Corpses are not people, just rotting meat. *NM* - 12/01/2011 08:40:02 PM 170 Views
I suppose that's fair, but I wouldn't try selling it to the family. - 12/01/2011 08:56:30 PM 406 Views
You're confusing two separate issues. - 12/01/2011 09:01:55 PM 408 Views
I think the trauma to the familys could (and probably should) be considered criminal as well. - 12/01/2011 09:07:57 PM 377 Views
How? Why? - 12/01/2011 09:40:32 PM 413 Views
I thought the rights of next to kin were pretty generally recognized. - 13/01/2011 09:54:39 PM 359 Views
Some personal opinions in the form of answers. - 12/01/2011 08:37:25 PM 431 Views
Re: Some personal opinions in the form of answers. - 12/01/2011 11:01:50 PM 388 Views
Of course a corpse is property. - 13/01/2011 05:27:34 AM 410 Views
Apparently it isn't, at least in California. - 13/01/2011 09:35:29 AM 478 Views
Strangely - 13/01/2011 07:13:17 PM 342 Views
consensual necrophilia? - 12/01/2011 09:40:44 PM 400 Views
Re: consensual necrophilia? - 12/01/2011 09:43:40 PM 373 Views
no to both - 12/01/2011 09:43:28 PM 401 Views
I'm afraid I'm struggling to see what your actual argument is. - 12/01/2011 11:14:29 PM 398 Views
My argument is that society has the right to say some things are just wrong - 13/01/2011 12:12:01 AM 387 Views
Hm? - 12/01/2011 11:07:19 PM 404 Views
Well said (on both) *NM* - 12/01/2011 11:22:08 PM 175 Views
Interesting... - 13/01/2011 12:16:50 AM 390 Views
yes to both *NM* - 13/01/2011 06:21:39 AM 155 Views
Re: Some legal questions. - 13/01/2011 08:33:18 AM 403 Views
Re: Some legal questions. - 13/01/2011 07:06:04 PM 407 Views
hhmmmm - 14/01/2011 03:55:38 AM 377 Views

Reply to Message