It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
Shannow Send a noteboard - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
The fact of the matter is, there is absolutely NO connection between Jared Lee Loughner and the Tea Party, the Right in general or Sarah Palin in particular.
The Fort Hood gunman actually shouted Allah Akbar (or whatever they call it) while carrying out his shooting rampage, but for some reason any reaction against Muslims (which would have been well founded in that case) was immediately rejected by the mainstream media. No. The guy was a loner, with no association to Jihadist ideology, despite his obvious actions to the contrary.
And yet, here in the Tuscon shooting, we have a lone gunman lunatic who has NEVER professed to support the Right, and yet even before the facts are out, the mainstream media start blaming it on Palin, the Tea Party and all those "gun toting, Bible clutching" conservatives.
Come on.
The mainstream media is completely biased towards the Left. Sure, Fox is biased towards the Right, but that doesn't even come close to balancing out the overwhelming liberal favoritism of the other news networks.
The Fort Hood gunman actually shouted Allah Akbar (or whatever they call it) while carrying out his shooting rampage, but for some reason any reaction against Muslims (which would have been well founded in that case) was immediately rejected by the mainstream media. No. The guy was a loner, with no association to Jihadist ideology, despite his obvious actions to the contrary.
And yet, here in the Tuscon shooting, we have a lone gunman lunatic who has NEVER professed to support the Right, and yet even before the facts are out, the mainstream media start blaming it on Palin, the Tea Party and all those "gun toting, Bible clutching" conservatives.
Come on.
The mainstream media is completely biased towards the Left. Sure, Fox is biased towards the Right, but that doesn't even come close to balancing out the overwhelming liberal favoritism of the other news networks.
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
2106 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"?
- 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM
958 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable.
- 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM
1134 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but...
- 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM
1180 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already
- 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM
1494 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread.
- 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM
1035 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either
- 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM
1063 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it.
- 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM
1053 Views
Oh please don't you start to
- 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM
912 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before.
- 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM
1094 Views
it was used here and nobody commented
- 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM
973 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here
- 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM
1018 Views
It's funny you should say that...
- 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM
1061 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin).
- 19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM
1204 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim
- 19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM
1139 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died.
- 19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM
867 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that...
- 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM
1041 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry.
- 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM
1085 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright.
- 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM
901 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means?
- 19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM
944 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely.
- 19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM
1061 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either
- 17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM
925 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
1106 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM
1144 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her.
- 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM
1288 Views
That means precisely nothing
- 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM
988 Views
It means everything.
- 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM
1235 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic
- 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM
843 Views
There are two points:
- 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM
1050 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM*
- 19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM
497 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable.
- 19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM
1029 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it.
- 20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM
1057 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument
- 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM
1133 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing.
- 20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM
991 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM*
- 20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM
489 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way.
- 20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM
1023 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic
- 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM
1080 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel.
- 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM
971 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin
- 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM
1046 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
- 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
1353 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing
- 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
1003 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin.
- 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
1048 Views
so in other words you again missed the point
- 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM
984 Views
Well, one of us did.
- 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM
1115 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"?
- 20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM
734 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin?
- 20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM
1180 Views
So I am a little confused on something...
- 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM
1124 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this
- 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM
1261 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly...
- 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM
998 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
1017 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM
1077 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically.
- 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM
890 Views
No, they don't
- 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM
1090 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one.
- 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM
1167 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said
- 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM
1025 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice)
- 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM
1057 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity
- 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM
1124 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice?
- 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM
1139 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens
- 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM
964 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing. 
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
900 Views
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
900 Views
way to dodge the point again
- 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM
932 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one?
- 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
1003 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again*
- 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM
985 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it.
- 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM
1004 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book.
- 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM
1304 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither.
- 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM
990 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto
- 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM
984 Views
That first line is says it all.
- 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
1067 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist
- 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM
1174 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power".
- 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM
1058 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
- 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
1280 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result.
- 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM
1072 Views
And I call bullshit
- 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM
1208 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face.
- 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM
1164 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin?
- 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM
1052 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM*
- 19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM
492 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do.
- 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
1144 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM*
- 18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM
577 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed.
- 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM
1006 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM*
- 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM
489 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know).
- 17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM
1007 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM*
- 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM
458 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. 
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
954 Views
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
954 Views
Took you this long, huh?
- 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM
900 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick.
- 18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM
1235 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy
- 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM
930 Views
I'm just curious.
- 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM
892 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party.
- 18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM
1189 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ).
- 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM
1114 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity
- 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM
931 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs?
- 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM
985 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you
- 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM
918 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM
1033 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't
- 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM
827 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that.
- 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM
918 Views
only in your does the connection exisit
- 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM
967 Views
No.
- 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM
1039 Views
dude wake up
- 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
1171 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations.
- 20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM
1166 Views
Why not just blame Giffords?
- 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM
1251 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does.
- 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM
1086 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner
- 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM
1030 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues.
- 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM
1125 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right
- 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM
907 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit 
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
944 Views
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
944 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics'
- 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM
895 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I?
- 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
1230 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state
- 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM
972 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric.
- 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM
935 Views
it was the national democrats
- 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM
1033 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC.
- 20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM
1298 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue
- 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM
943 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM
918 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me.
- 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM
1098 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox
- 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM
836 Views
You missed the point, obviously.
- 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM
946 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM*
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long.
- 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM
1100 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM
1114 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact
- 22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM
1087 Views