Active Users:629 Time:23/12/2025 03:06:43 AM
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. Joel Send a noteboard - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
Palin should be apologizing for 'targeting' certain districts because the representative in one of those districts was shot by a crazy man. Palin should not be, in any way, defending herself when being attacked by Liberals who are laying the blame solely at her feet with no evidence beyond the circumstantial in support of the accusation. (And the last is my understanding of the phrase 'blood libel' as used by Palin, which in this context would make perfect sense)

I wonder what would happen if I posted on facebook or made a website that said, "Someone should do something about China" And Russia nuked them 10 months later.

Try re-reading what the Representative said, which I only just found out was during an interview about her office being torn up after a self appointed militia leader urged people to throw bricks through the windows of everyone who voted for healthcare. She didn't object to the use of the word "target" but did worry about the "consequences" of images with her district and others in crosshairs. The interviewer pooh poohed the notion there could be ANY connection between her vandalized office and all the hatred and militance stirred up in the past two years, dismissed the idea anything bad could come of her district being shown in a gunsight. Her place of business was attacked and then she was shot; don't you think there MIGHT be something to her suggestion that all the vitriolic rhetoric and violent language against her played a role? I'll make the same suggestion to you that I did to Palin: Go to her hospital room and accuse her of "blood libel" to her face. Yeah, I'm sure that now that Giffords is out of her medically induced coma and recovering from the surgery to remove part of her skull so she didn't die she feels just awful about what SHE'S done to poor Sarah.... :rolleyes:

Try your little FB experiment with a US Congressmans name in place of Chinas and see how long it takes the Secret Service to call.... 8}
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2151 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1014 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1178 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1229 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1193 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1549 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1088 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1115 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1104 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1007 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 954 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1145 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1022 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1069 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1110 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1093 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1132 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1185 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1276 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 951 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1098 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1070 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1154 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1195 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1346 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1043 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1286 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 893 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1104 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 927 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1311 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1180 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1131 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1178 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1314 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1044 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1070 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1129 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 938 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1139 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1239 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1073 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1131 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1207 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1187 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1016 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1033 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1050 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1086 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1337 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1352 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1098 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1018 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1038 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1029 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1113 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1219 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1107 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1112 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1052 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1336 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1160 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 979 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1056 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1117 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 512 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 483 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1010 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 524 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1199 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 948 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 978 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 937 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1098 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 967 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 956 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1106 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 993 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1163 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 996 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1037 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 969 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1078 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 876 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 972 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1015 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1090 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1218 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 965 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1015 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1316 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1137 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1145 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 564 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 886 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 997 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1073 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 915 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 544 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1153 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1180 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1222 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1166 Views

Reply to Message