Seriously, why don't you take a little time to go through your arguments and find the massive gaping logic holes, you might find it a rewarding experience. Also, why do you keep insisting Palin accused Giffords of Blood Libel? She obviously did not. You also have some really weird ideas about what Giffords reporting a threat prior to that means, you do understand that that is very common, don't you? Where are you getting this bizarre notion that Giffords alerting authorities she'd been vandalized justifies media hacks engaging in defamation?

You sound like a murder mystery fan at a crime scene "I found a knife with blood on it on the kitchen counter! Her neighbor's prints are on the doorknob! He owns knives! Case closed! Wait, what? Oh I guess it wouldn't make sense for the murderer to pull the knife out and leave it on the kitchen counter. No I didn't realize the back door was broken or that she died of bludgeoning wounds and a paper weight covered with blood was found a few feet away and rolled under her desk. Or that her neighbor is an 85 year old woman with a spare key who was at her daughter's house with her grandchildren and her ex-boyfriend was just picked up drunk and covered with blood with no visible wounds... a clever plot indeed. The old lady must have drugged him"