Active Users:524 Time:03/03/2026 02:33:50 PM
That first line is says it all. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
Mein Kampf was written by a socialist.

The fact that Ms. Giffords played the typical liberal game of pumping up their base with the "they are crazy and they are after us" fear mongering really isn't relevant. She wasn't bothered by democrats using very similar imagery.

Being shot does make her an instant saint or prophet.

Calling it "national socialism" was a Trojan Horse directed at German leftists and no one on the left or right, or either side of the Atlantic, bought it for a second. Hitler got elected by burning the Reichstag just so he could accuse the left of treason (SOUND FAMILIAR? :rolleyes: ) When the right fought the left in the Spanish Civil War it was fascists vs. communists, not Republicans vs. fascists and communists (ironically, Francos party called themselves "Republicans" but that was mere coincidence; it doesn't taint the GOP except to the extent some GOP members then supported Franco politically and financially). Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Tojo hated the left--ALL of it--with a passion even you can't imagine.

But none of that's relevant here except insofar as how much the far rights agenda has distored it's grasp of political science and historical fact because Loughner is neither right nor left, he's just a violent paranoid nut with a record of criminal activity and mental instability who still got a gun because background checks before buying one are no longer mandatory.

If you want to call Giffords statement a political game, that's fine, but the FACTS are

1) She said Palins imagery endangered her,

2) She's been shot and

3) Palin says 2) makes 1) "blood libel".

If you want to accuse Giffords, go to her hospital room and do so--if you have that much guts and that little shame. :[
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM 2167 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"? - 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM 1032 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable. - 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM 1199 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but... - 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM 1243 Views
That's why I said, "popularized". - 16/01/2011 01:46:52 PM 1210 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already - 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM 1583 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread. - 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM 1107 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either - 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM 1139 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM 1129 Views
Re: I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it. - 16/01/2011 11:30:38 PM 1026 Views
Oh please don't you start to - 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM 974 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before. - 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM 1164 Views
it was used here and nobody commented - 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM 1045 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here - 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM 1087 Views
It's funny you should say that... - 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM 1130 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that... - 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM 1114 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry. - 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM 1149 Views
A rallying cry is hardly illegal - 20/01/2011 05:32:45 PM 1201 Views
I never said it was. - 20/01/2011 06:59:39 PM 1299 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright. - 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM 970 Views
compared to the way similar terms are used? - 19/01/2011 06:58:02 PM 1118 Views
I meant I hadn't seen it used in different contexts before. - 19/01/2011 07:35:00 PM 1091 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM 1176 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him. - 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM 1220 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her. - 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM 1363 Views
That means precisely nothing - 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM 1065 Views
It means everything. - 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM 1308 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic - 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM 911 Views
There are two points: - 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM 1124 Views
Re: It means everything. - 19/01/2011 05:55:02 PM 945 Views
That's simply illogical. - 20/01/2011 01:08:51 AM 1333 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument - 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM 1197 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic - 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM 1154 Views
So I am a little confused on something... - 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM 1195 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this - 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM 1332 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly... - 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM 1064 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM 1087 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand. - 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM 1149 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically. - 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM 960 Views
No, they don't - 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM 1158 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one. - 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM 1260 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said - 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM 1089 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice) - 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM 1152 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity - 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM 1231 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice? - 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM 1208 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens - 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM 1034 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again* - 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM 1052 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it. - 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM 1072 Views
There is no point - 21/01/2011 12:22:30 AM 1108 Views
If I had no point I wouldn't bother, but fair enough. - 21/01/2011 01:20:32 AM 1356 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book. - 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM 1370 Views
You're awesome at missing points, aren't you? - 16/01/2011 07:26:30 PM 1120 Views
where is the accountability for those committing slander? - 17/01/2011 02:52:40 PM 1039 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither. - 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM 1058 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto - 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM 1047 Views
That first line is says it all. - 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM 1138 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist - 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM 1237 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power". - 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM 1125 Views
and that is supposed to mean something? - 20/01/2011 06:06:18 PM 1132 Views
YOU are cherry picking. - 20/01/2011 07:50:21 PM 1071 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central... - 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM 1359 Views
See my reply to Dragonsoul above. - 16/01/2011 07:30:40 PM 1177 Views
Yeah, your first was better - 16/01/2011 09:48:58 PM 1000 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed. - 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM 1073 Views
Pretty much. - 16/01/2011 11:44:35 PM 1139 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM* - 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM 524 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM* - 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM 492 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah. - 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM 1029 Views
OK Olberman when did I imply otherwise? *NM* - 19/01/2011 02:48:41 PM 534 Views
"Political offices are vandalized on a regular basis". - 20/01/2011 03:16:39 AM 1220 Views
Took you this long, huh? - 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM 963 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy - 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM 1002 Views
I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM 966 Views
Re: I'm just curious. - 17/01/2011 03:28:04 PM 1116 Views
I always said I'd do that after Bush was re-elected. - 18/01/2011 11:52:45 PM 989 Views
like I said a matter of faith - 17/01/2011 04:27:51 PM 975 Views
I find it interesting... - 17/01/2011 05:31:54 PM 1129 Views
I mention her looks solely because... - 20/01/2011 02:30:42 PM 1012 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ). - 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM 1185 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity - 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM 1018 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs? - 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM 1058 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you - 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM 990 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic. - 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM 1100 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't - 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM 895 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that. - 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM 994 Views
only in your does the connection exisit - 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM 1034 Views
No. - 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM 1112 Views
dude wake up - 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM 1241 Views
So in your opinion... - 17/01/2011 05:27:58 PM 980 Views
How 'bout simply color coding them? - 18/01/2011 11:21:03 PM 1036 Views
Why not just blame Giffords? - 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM 1340 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does. - 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM 1159 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me. - 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM 1163 Views
Exactly. *NM* - 19/01/2011 04:51:40 PM 574 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox - 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM 903 Views
You missed the point, obviously. - 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM 1017 Views
so you are saying it is the same old RAFO - 19/01/2011 06:47:24 PM 1092 Views
The thread has admittedly degenerated - 19/01/2011 07:02:12 PM 935 Views
Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM* - 19/01/2011 07:04:58 PM 559 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long. - 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM 1175 Views
Hey, now. I have to step in. - 20/01/2011 04:44:49 PM 1201 Views
I'm just saying a significant link can be demonstrated. - 20/01/2011 07:07:27 PM 1246 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS. - 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM 1194 Views

Reply to Message