In paragraph without referring to the 60'a can you show any single connection between him and Palin?
Giffords 2010 statement about Palins imagery and Loughners 2011 shooting are a BIT more recent, yes, so consider it done. Just because it started then doesn't change the fact it hasn't stopped.
connect the dots. Show how those to events are in anyway connected.
Can you in anyway show that he followed the politics beyond his own little conspiracy rants?
Can I show he followed it WITHOUT referencing him following it? That's literally impossible. Can you show Obama follows Dems beyond leading them?
No can you show anywhere he was following Palin? Can you show anything beyond you just knowing that would make someoen believe that anything Palin said had an impact on him or that he was even aware of what Palin said about her? His friends say he didn't follow politics so good luck.
If you insist that despite any actual evidence to support you that the political atmosphere played a role in this can you provide any factual evidence that would suggest it was right wing rhetoric and not left wing rhetoric that drove him to this? Because despite all the left wing rhetoric to the contrary the left has zero high ground when it comes to rhetoric.
I see you skipped this one.
If someone kills Palin tomorrow do you think having some many liberals accuse her of inspiring murder will be to blame? Do you think that all of the unfounded attacks on her increase the likelihood that some nut job will try and kill her? If so please go chastise yourself for being a hate monger and inspiring violence.
I've been very careful to avoid violent imagery; I usually am, and for good reason, so, no, if someone commits an act of violence for which I've never even implied support I won't feel responsible. You're reaching, and it smells, rightly or not, of desperation. The connection with Palin herself was made in 2010, but you want evidence more recent than the '60s. I have to show Loughners political actions and interests without referencing any of them. And, to top it all off, the now classic "how dare you call him a conservative when he's obviously a liberal" as if there are so few conservative pols in AZ that liberal nuts there have to gun down fellow liberals.
Sorry but have in way made a connection between what Palin said in his actions. That really is the long and short of this debate. You have nothing to connect these to except your desire for them to be connected.
If that's the best way you can defend the far rights inflammatory violent rhetoric you should CONSIDER the possibility it's indefensible.
I think the whole far right inflammatroy rhetoric argument is a stinky pile of crap that can't be defended and is only believed by the far left. SHow me something to make me believe the right is doing this even a tiny bit more then the left. Please don't come back with the worthless reply that you condem both sides unless you are willing stop calling it right wing rhetoric.
OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 16/01/2011 12:18:22 PM
2152 Views
Why are they calling it "blood libel"?
- 16/01/2011 12:23:47 PM
1014 Views
Because if the facts were as they represent them those words would be applicable.
- 16/01/2011 12:49:22 PM
1179 Views
It's not entirely clear to me whether you're aware of this or not, but...
- 16/01/2011 01:12:22 PM
1229 Views
I think Alan Dershowitz dealt with this nonsense already
- 16/01/2011 02:34:10 PM
1550 Views
Interesting. I didn't realize it was so wide-spread.
- 16/01/2011 03:10:28 PM
1089 Views
She wasn't even the first to use the term that week either
- 16/01/2011 10:10:35 PM
1116 Views
I don't know that "expert" has anything to do with it.
- 16/01/2011 10:18:54 PM
1105 Views
Oh please don't you start to
- 17/01/2011 02:34:43 PM
954 Views
I for one hadn't noticed it before.
- 17/01/2011 10:25:57 PM
1145 Views
it was used here and nobody commented
- 17/01/2011 10:37:07 PM
1023 Views
LOL, I totally forgot that got posted here
- 17/01/2011 10:54:26 PM
1069 Views
It's funny you should say that...
- 18/01/2011 10:32:59 PM
1111 Views
Precisely: I noticed, but it hadn't become a rallying cry for "the real victim" (Palin).
- 19/01/2011 12:14:48 AM
1255 Views
I thought you were the real vicitim
- 19/01/2011 02:49:06 PM
1189 Views
When and where did I say that? The ultimate victim is America, but six members of it just died.
- 19/01/2011 11:24:27 PM
918 Views
Re: It's funny you should say that...
- 19/01/2011 03:29:52 PM
1093 Views
It was permissible to ignore until it became a rallying cry.
- 20/01/2011 04:27:23 PM
1132 Views
Oh, I noticed that one alright.
- 18/01/2011 10:25:23 PM
951 Views
but is he accussed of being a tasteless moron who doesn't know what it means?
- 19/01/2011 02:28:03 PM
995 Views
I don't know, if I have to judge him based on that one article, then tasteless moron, absolutely.
- 19/01/2011 06:14:43 PM
1113 Views
The peole who called her stupid for using the term didn't know it was so wide spread either
- 17/01/2011 02:33:19 PM
976 Views
Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 10:24:09 PM
1154 Views
Re: Indeed, my response to Legolas references Wikipedias quotation of him.
- 16/01/2011 11:09:21 PM
1196 Views
Again, Giffords specifically made the connection between Palins imagery and an attack on her.
- 17/01/2011 12:53:08 AM
1346 Views
That means precisely nothing
- 17/01/2011 03:59:07 PM
1044 Views
It means everything.
- 18/01/2011 08:34:55 PM
1288 Views
I'm trying to understand your logic
- 19/01/2011 12:50:28 AM
893 Views
There are two points:
- 19/01/2011 02:47:48 AM
1105 Views
I don't agree, but I understand. *NM*
- 19/01/2011 10:14:13 PM
521 Views
Giffords' statements and Palins are matters of public record; they're indisputable.
- 19/01/2011 11:34:53 PM
1083 Views
I must say, if more people on both sides could say that we'd all be better for it.
- 20/01/2011 04:32:55 AM
1112 Views
the old step one steal underwear step three profit argument
- 19/01/2011 06:01:14 PM
1181 Views
Your inability/unwillingness to follow basic and clearly delineated logic is not my failing.
- 20/01/2011 01:19:31 AM
1044 Views
I admit I can't follow gnome logic *NM*
- 20/01/2011 05:50:22 AM
515 Views
I demonstrated the connection, whether or not you choose to look the other way.
- 20/01/2011 03:16:28 PM
1074 Views
that is some twisted and bizarre logic
- 17/01/2011 02:38:41 PM
1131 Views
Giffords said Palins crosshairs imagery would have "consequences"; Palin calls the suggestion libel.
- 18/01/2011 08:54:45 PM
1018 Views
yes but the only consequences is liberals using them to slander Palin
- 19/01/2011 02:58:35 PM
1095 Views
I read Toms reply; I don't think he exactly vindicated your position, nor meant to do so.
- 20/01/2011 01:52:37 AM
1407 Views
It was an example of blaming the victim, a phrase you keep misusing
- 20/01/2011 06:28:21 PM
1055 Views
I thought you said only liberals blinded by political bias committed that grave sin.
- 20/01/2011 07:47:09 PM
1099 Views
so in other words you again missed the point
- 20/01/2011 08:26:49 PM
1036 Views
Well, one of us did.
- 20/01/2011 09:24:35 PM
1165 Views
so lets be clear do you or don't you understand what it means to "blame the vicitm"?
- 20/01/2011 10:03:48 PM
790 Views
I understand it well; can we be equally clear you say the victim here is Palin?
- 20/01/2011 10:44:08 PM
1234 Views
So I am a little confused on something...
- 16/01/2011 02:38:59 PM
1179 Views
Palin putting Giffords district in the crosshairs and Giffords implying at the time she feared this
- 16/01/2011 11:21:36 PM
1314 Views
If I understand what you are saying correctly...
- 17/01/2011 07:07:56 AM
1044 Views
I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 08:33:47 AM
1070 Views
Re: I'm sorry you so badly misunderstand.
- 17/01/2011 04:24:01 PM
1130 Views
The Secret Service does guard Congressmen, just not all of them automatically.
- 18/01/2011 09:13:39 PM
939 Views
No, they don't
- 18/01/2011 10:19:34 PM
1139 Views
Really? Cannoli says differently, and I believe he's right on that one.
- 18/01/2011 10:50:51 PM
1240 Views
You seem to be reading what you want to from what I said
- 19/01/2011 01:27:32 PM
1074 Views
I read what you said & understood it as you restate here, hence I referenced local police (twice)
- 20/01/2011 02:15:17 AM
1132 Views
The problem here is your ignoring normal policing powers to concoct an absurdity
- 20/01/2011 04:20:25 PM
1208 Views
More absurd than the notion such incitement warrants no notice?
- 20/01/2011 05:42:47 PM
1188 Views
really because people post that kind of crap daily and nothing happens
- 20/01/2011 05:57:52 PM
1017 Views
I thought waterboarding was OK and any suggestion to the contrary was terrorist sympathizing.
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
951 Views
- 20/01/2011 07:54:05 PM
951 Views
way to dodge the point again
- 20/01/2011 08:34:33 PM
990 Views
Do you have an example of a credible threat of injury to a Congressman, or calls for one?
- 20/01/2011 10:02:53 PM
1053 Views
Your shifting your original premise, *again*
- 20/01/2011 08:24:18 PM
1034 Views
No, you're simply missing the point of it.
- 20/01/2011 11:09:57 PM
1051 Views
Uh...Last I checked conservatives didn't list the Communist Manifesto as a favourite book.
- 16/01/2011 03:05:07 PM
1353 Views
Libs hate Mein Kampf and We the Living; conservatives hate the Communist Manifesto: He's neither.
- 16/01/2011 10:06:02 PM
1038 Views
conseartives hate Mein Kampf and liberals stil read the Communist Manifesto
- 17/01/2011 02:57:22 PM
1029 Views
That first line is says it all.
- 18/01/2011 09:34:06 PM
1114 Views
Nazis had more in common with communist then capitalist
- 19/01/2011 04:10:09 PM
1220 Views
The founder of fascism called it "the merger of corporate and national power".
- 20/01/2011 02:51:09 AM
1108 Views
It is to be expected that this site would be libtard central...
- 16/01/2011 05:23:53 PM
1336 Views
Again, I don't think Palin intended this, but Giffords feared ten months ago that this could result.
- 16/01/2011 11:29:19 PM
1126 Views
And I call bullshit
- 18/01/2011 03:12:13 PM
1255 Views
If Palin wants to accuse Giffords of libel she should have the guts to do it to her face.
- 18/01/2011 10:39:07 PM
1212 Views
So if some jihadist shot Gifford, would you also blame Palin?
- 19/01/2011 02:52:42 PM
1110 Views
don't get ti doesn't matter who is to blame it just matters if they can use it *NM*
- 19/01/2011 04:11:09 PM
517 Views
No, I'd blame the shooter first and the mullahs shouting, "JIHAD111" second, as I always do.
- 20/01/2011 03:11:33 AM
1194 Views
Then why are you even here? I pretty much agree with you entirely and I'm fairly liberal. *NM*
- 18/01/2011 01:16:33 PM
600 Views
Palin didn't really have anything to do with this, but it makes sense she's blamed.
- 16/01/2011 10:19:51 PM
1057 Views
Did they ever catch the person(s) that vandalized Gifford's office? *NM*
- 17/01/2011 03:30:36 AM
513 Views
I didn't realize someone had, but it appears a militia leader was responsible (shocking, I know).
- 17/01/2011 07:04:08 AM
1068 Views
politcal offices are vandalized on a regular basis *NM*
- 17/01/2011 02:41:29 PM
483 Views
She only asked if they caught the guy, she didn't accuse anyone, Sarah.
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
1010 Views
- 18/01/2011 11:27:18 PM
1010 Views
Took you this long, huh?
- 17/01/2011 01:53:31 PM
948 Views
I didn't want to look because I was afraid the charges against the far right demagogues might stick.
- 18/01/2011 11:07:26 PM
1289 Views
I am sick of the desperate attempts of liberals to find a way to use a tragedy
- 17/01/2011 02:31:18 PM
979 Views
I'm just curious.
- 17/01/2011 03:23:47 PM
938 Views
Had that convo with the cab driver on the way home from a New Years party.
- 18/01/2011 11:42:07 PM
1244 Views
If slander, not mine, Giffords' (at least you don't err like Palin and say, "libel" ).
- 18/01/2011 11:14:23 PM
1164 Views
mark you calendar today is the day Joel offically went around the bend into insanity
- 19/01/2011 05:28:06 PM
997 Views
A mirror will show me who's to blame? On whom have I put a crosshairs?
- 20/01/2011 03:23:43 AM
1037 Views
so it is all a matter of faith for you
- 20/01/2011 05:48:44 AM
969 Views
No, it's fairly straight forward logic.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:56 PM
1079 Views
sorry Joel but you haven't
- 20/01/2011 03:29:49 PM
876 Views
It's there; in this thread alone people from both sides of the aisle have acknowledged that.
- 20/01/2011 05:51:21 PM
973 Views
only in your does the connection exisit
- 20/01/2011 06:39:35 PM
1016 Views
No.
- 20/01/2011 07:35:09 PM
1091 Views
dude wake up
- 20/01/2011 08:54:33 PM
1220 Views
Fine, I have no problem dropping the "right" label in my condemnations.
- 20/01/2011 10:39:34 PM
1231 Views
Why not just blame Giffords?
- 17/01/2011 06:07:14 PM
1317 Views
Indeed, why not; Sarah Palin does.
- 18/01/2011 06:58:01 PM
1138 Views
The left are the ones storing up hate with their pathetic slaner
- 18/01/2011 07:53:23 PM
1087 Views
At least 95% of the blame is Loughners; he's a nut, but that doesn't exonerate the demagogues.
- 18/01/2011 11:24:11 PM
1168 Views
0% belongs to political rhetoric from the right
- 19/01/2011 02:47:56 PM
958 Views
Uh huh; it's absurd to mention right wing rhetoric when left wing rhetoric is the OBVIOUS culprit
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
999 Views
- 19/01/2011 02:59:41 PM
999 Views
No leftist rhetoric? You just called a bunch of people 'dangeorus lunatics'
- 19/01/2011 03:37:54 PM
947 Views
Rhetoric is one thing, but I didn't use violent imagery, did I?
- 20/01/2011 01:40:14 AM
1282 Views
no but the democratic party used very similar images in the same state
- 20/01/2011 06:41:19 PM
1025 Views
It's news to me, but I condemn all violent inflammatory imagery and rhetoric.
- 20/01/2011 07:13:18 PM
984 Views
it was the national democrats
- 20/01/2011 08:32:01 PM
1086 Views
Then that's equally dangerous and reprehensible and more reason to loathe the DLC and DCCC.
- 20/01/2011 09:49:08 PM
1352 Views
The right is not the ones claiming rhetoric is the issue
- 19/01/2011 03:58:39 PM
993 Views
"WE aren't doing it, except for when we are". Admission of guilt is a poor defense.
- 20/01/2011 03:25:16 AM
967 Views
The irony of this thread is not lost on me.
- 19/01/2011 04:09:01 PM
1145 Views
Bizarre thread for that Soapbox
- 19/01/2011 05:17:58 PM
887 Views
You missed the point, obviously.
- 19/01/2011 06:04:23 PM
998 Views
That I knew it would go this way is why I avoided looking closely for so long.
- 19/01/2011 11:20:44 PM
1154 Views
Re: OK, I'm Officially Sick of the "Blood Libel" BS.
- 22/01/2011 05:49:44 PM
1167 Views
We can debate whether it's coincidental, but the connections are documented fact
- 22/01/2011 08:17:24 PM
1141 Views

Check your NB. Noted you a response. *NM*