Active Users:435 Time:18/06/2025 12:13:52 PM
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
We have more context for the global warming guy than Rush. Now to be fair Rush is very likely putting the very worst spin he can come up with on this guys words. You two are kind of reverse polarity Twinkies in that regard. But I would like to know what "signs" the guy is talking about and the way he worded it does seem to imply that Mother Nature (notice the caps) was somehow involved.

He stated the signs he was talking about so you don't have to guess. Maybe I'm being too verbose and hard to follow again; snoop makes exactly the same point in response to Isaac, but as usual does it far more concisely. The other PARAGRAPHS in the mans statement clarify the single SENTENCE that would otherwise be so ambiguous as to be meaningless. Limbaughs comments are unambiguous; do you have or just really want to believe in a statement by him that changes that? Note that I'm not begging the question, because I'm referring to something we all know he said clearly.
Of course we could have just waited to have this whole discussion until someone blamed gays. I am really shocked that it hasn't happened yet.

Give Pat Robertson time. ;) Just don't complain around the Tea Party if he blames gays, or you might be shocked to learn you're a Muslim/terrorist. :rolleyes:
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 16/03/2011 at 09:20:14 PM
Reply to message
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on? - 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM 914 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president - 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM 822 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming. - 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM 624 Views
Actually people have - 16/03/2011 04:31:37 PM 774 Views
Which people? Where? Example? - 16/03/2011 06:48:10 PM 793 Views
Tsunami and climate change - 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM 786 Views
A slightly misleading post - 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM 715 Views
Surprised? *NM* - 16/03/2011 08:59:35 PM 302 Views
Not completely. *NM* - 16/03/2011 09:13:48 PM 262 Views
Kind of missed the point there - 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM 706 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it. - 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM 591 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it. - 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM 717 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed.... - 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM 735 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed.... - 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM 562 Views
Fair enough. - 17/03/2011 12:08:13 AM 668 Views
Re: Fair enough. - 17/03/2011 12:37:12 AM 646 Views
No worries. - 17/03/2011 12:48:44 AM 906 Views
I've read the transcript - 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM 736 Views
Re: I've read the transcript - 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM 642 Views
You need to reread what I said - 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM 610 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point - 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM 684 Views
Perhaps - 16/03/2011 11:26:37 PM 742 Views
Okay, I'm done - 16/03/2011 11:37:58 PM 639 Views
Seriously, you need to pick a better example to make your point - 18/03/2011 05:00:10 PM 622 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it". - 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM 641 Views
I told you, I'm done in this thread - 16/03/2011 11:59:08 PM 604 Views
Acknowledged (though I'd not seen that response yet, sorry). - 17/03/2011 12:11:58 AM 655 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means - 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM 735 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush - 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM 680 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did. - 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM 605 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it - 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM 706 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it. - 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM 672 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard - 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM 615 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe. - 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM 740 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be - 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM 629 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright - 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM 795 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done - 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM 671 Views
Hey, guys! - 16/03/2011 10:55:07 PM 566 Views
and how its that different than what I said? *NM* - 16/03/2011 11:14:46 PM 256 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless. - 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM 745 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters - 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM 634 Views
Yes: It makes it worse. - 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM 638 Views
Re: At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard - 16/03/2011 09:22:37 PM 759 Views
maybe he heard that they were blaming it on Pearl Harbor *NM* - 16/03/2011 10:14:59 PM 244 Views

Reply to Message