I find that people whose understanding of reality is close to mine can self-identify as believers, atheists or agnostics and all be very close to one another in their philosophy. I would call myself a "believer" in the sense that I reject the strictest form of atheism, an "agnostic" in terms of affirmative belief with respect to any particular idea or philosophy, and an "atheist" if one is required to adopt a belief system in toto to be a believer.
I was reading _______ a few months ago, and he talked about how the most intelligent Christian theorists he had ever met had truly understood the metaphorical nature of their belief system. These were people at the top of their faith structure, presiding over a organization of materialist, "orthodox" religious followers, and in a lot of ways, they might be considered atheists - but it is about self-identification, not outside classification. And metaphors, or allegories, or whatever you'd like to call them, still contain a lot of power - power which is important, and sometimes, unexplainable.
As to the strictest form of atheism: this is why I find Daoism so powerful or interesting. One of the tenents is: don't use something limited (human understanding or logic) to explain something unlimited (existence, or "the meaning" of existence). It's like trying to use a ruler to measure wind velocity. There's a lot that can't be explained, and it may be because we don't yet have the skills for it yet, or it may be because it's inexplicable because of some other metaphysical/ontological force, and we shouldn't just reject it outright.
(typed quickly in a small square box, so I don't get shitcanned)
I cannot even copy his manner because the manner of his prose was the manner of his thinking and that was a dazzling succession of gaps; and you cannot ape a gap because you are bound to fill it in somehow or other -- and blot it out in the process. -- Nabokov
Questions about souls...
12/04/2011 03:06:54 AM
- 2229 Views
You assume we all know, and agree on, what "soul" means.
12/04/2011 08:42:47 AM
- 1079 Views
It is what hope, which is a thing with feathers, perches on.
12/04/2011 07:32:07 PM
- 1140 Views
But seriously, what does it do?
12/04/2011 11:01:58 PM
- 1138 Views
it wouldn't change much for me, but I'm pretty flexible in my spiritual beliefs
12/04/2011 04:23:34 PM
- 1171 Views
Re: Questions about souls...
12/04/2011 05:44:53 PM
- 1231 Views
What a fantasy.
12/04/2011 07:57:38 PM
- 1089 Views
Your comments, or mine?
13/04/2011 01:24:53 AM
- 1564 Views

I'm a Christian who is partial to reincarnation, so I do not think much would change.
12/04/2011 06:21:36 PM
- 1131 Views
*is disappointed* *NM*
12/04/2011 08:01:05 PM
- 558 Views
You'd be surprised how frequently I get that from both sides.
12/04/2011 08:22:24 PM
- 1111 Views

I bet you do!
12/04/2011 08:47:59 PM
- 1075 Views
I think we are similar in some respects philosophically.
13/04/2011 05:59:38 AM
- 1063 Views
That's pretty much how I feel. Being a universalist helps in that respect. *NM*
13/04/2011 06:25:34 AM
- 628 Views
So then my question is....
13/04/2011 07:08:42 PM
- 1019 Views
Because I believe that Jesus was an incarnation of the λόγος.
14/04/2011 12:36:36 AM
- 1046 Views
*heh*
14/04/2011 04:12:32 PM
- 1164 Views
I think I answered it pretty clearly in my post title. *NM*
14/04/2011 06:59:47 PM
- 639 Views
I think that, like a lot of other people responding, I would want and need more information.
12/04/2011 07:13:14 PM
- 1052 Views
Speaking of the agnostic/atheist thing
12/04/2011 07:40:04 PM
- 1109 Views
99% that there is no God...
12/04/2011 08:08:42 PM
- 1157 Views
Technically, no, atheists simply lack belief in a God.
12/04/2011 08:19:15 PM
- 1090 Views

Whoah there,
12/04/2011 08:26:43 PM
- 1077 Views
Okay, I have to admit I wasn't expecting to get called out on that.
13/04/2011 04:03:08 AM
- 1182 Views
And that's why I don't quibble with %'s, I just say I'm an atheist
*NM*
12/04/2011 09:45:31 PM
- 674 Views

It certainly doesn't mean you can't make conclusions.
12/04/2011 08:09:41 PM
- 1174 Views
Re: Campbell:
12/04/2011 08:42:09 PM
- 1162 Views
Self-identification is an interesting point here.
12/04/2011 09:00:46 PM
- 1093 Views
Re: Agree
12/04/2011 09:22:22 PM
- 1107 Views
Sadly enough, one of my favorite explanations of religion came from someone discussing a video game.
13/04/2011 04:12:23 AM
- 1108 Views
Re: I'm basically a Magi. I'm going to travel to Brazil and then take over the world. *NM*
13/04/2011 04:18:25 AM
- 674 Views
Either you meant "Magus" or you are a schizophrenic wizard. Both are acceptably awesome.
13/04/2011 05:37:34 AM
- 1103 Views
Re: I think it was Jarod Diamond...
14/04/2011 03:39:32 AM
- 1089 Views
Answers.
12/04/2011 09:05:38 PM
- 1067 Views
That's not a compelling counter-argument for me.
12/04/2011 11:22:21 PM
- 1238 Views
Never mind.
12/04/2011 11:34:46 PM
- 1032 Views
Have you had any vivid dreams that came true?
13/04/2011 01:16:59 AM
- 1009 Views
My mom used to have dreams like that, usually about relatives.
13/04/2011 02:25:45 AM
- 1195 Views
I can easily believe that.
13/04/2011 06:14:51 AM
- 1009 Views
Taking things at face value is usually unwise, but the face value can still be correct.
24/04/2011 12:11:51 AM
- 952 Views
Minivans can fit lots of useful stuffs, like furniture. *NM*
13/04/2011 03:47:04 PM
- 638 Views
So can gas-guzzling SUVs, and full trucks. *NM*
13/04/2011 05:13:20 PM
- 589 Views
for that matter, you can fit a surprising amount even in a baby truck! *NM*
13/04/2011 06:36:58 PM
- 569 Views
Well, as I said in my census form on Sunday
12/04/2011 08:36:05 PM
- 1198 Views
It would upset my belief in science
12/04/2011 09:39:39 PM
- 1202 Views
There's so much wrong with that statement.
12/04/2011 09:55:45 PM
- 1178 Views
If science proved there really was an Easter Bunny would it affect your believe in science? *NM*
12/04/2011 10:30:09 PM
- 679 Views
*is both bored and annoyed*
12/04/2011 11:03:10 PM
- 1069 Views
and what if science proved that science was false?
12/04/2011 11:48:32 PM
- 1141 Views
I think that's kind of the point; it can't.
13/04/2011 01:33:44 AM
- 1014 Views
Did you read my original post?
13/04/2011 03:13:34 AM
- 983 Views
I did, yes.
13/04/2011 03:32:18 AM
- 1028 Views
Yes it would upset my belief in science, why is that so hard to accept
13/04/2011 01:56:59 PM
- 1136 Views
Well, if that's all it is, we know that a lot of that broad base is wrong.
24/04/2011 01:18:05 AM
- 1262 Views
What's a soul?
12/04/2011 10:51:39 PM
- 1053 Views
I can only give you my personal take.
13/04/2011 01:47:39 AM
- 1181 Views
Actually the reason you don't revive people denied oxygen half an hour is due to chemical processes.
13/04/2011 04:08:37 AM
- 1111 Views
True, but even well preserved brains require more than a jump start to resume life.
23/04/2011 09:20:42 PM
- 961 Views
so did this guy took a railroad spike through the head
13/04/2011 01:58:52 PM
- 1198 Views
Nah, he just got someone else's added to him. But now Ruin can influence him.
*NM*
13/04/2011 06:38:31 PM
- 641 Views

Thanks a lot
13/04/2011 07:02:29 PM
- 1058 Views
I'm really happy you've read them and got the reference. Phineas Gage, Steel Inquisitor.
*NM*
14/04/2011 12:29:01 AM
- 565 Views

No.
23/04/2011 09:15:16 PM
- 1075 Views
but we know personality can be draticaly altered by physical means
24/04/2011 03:28:36 AM
- 1387 Views
I assume you're implying time travel between past-life or future-life experiences.
12/04/2011 11:26:19 PM
- 1098 Views
I would becoming interested in tracing people's souls across time/space
13/04/2011 04:00:51 PM
- 1055 Views
Re: I would becoming interested in tracing people's souls across time/space
14/04/2011 03:29:55 AM
- 1132 Views
Interesting concept....
13/04/2011 07:28:42 PM
- 1033 Views
Heh. Loose faith.
14/04/2011 02:32:27 AM
- 1035 Views