Active Users:2111 Time:23/10/2025 04:57:31 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 Send a noteboard - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM
It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.


and I had to skip over some that took me in a loop... but yeah, it worked!
~g~

*MySmiley*
CrazedWeasel
"Do not waste time bothering whether you "love" your neighbor; act as if you did...When you are behaving as if you loved someone you will presently come to love him."-- C. S. Lewis
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? Camilla - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 1089 Views
I did. Kaldric - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 778 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. MightyYT - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 710 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 325 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* MightyYT - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 352 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* jh - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 290 Views
Indeed Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 656 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd beetnemesis - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 692 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 345 Views
Me! Monique - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 937 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 733 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 737 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... Camilla - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 713 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... moondog - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 668 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. Stephen - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 686 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. Tom - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 777 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* Helene - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 330 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* Aeryn - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 393 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM 328 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh Isaac - 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM 730 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago. Aemon - 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM 743 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM* Tom - 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM 300 Views
... *NM* Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 310 Views
*NM* globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 330 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 723 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 772 Views
Huh. Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 751 Views
Re: Huh. Camilla - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 780 Views
Random words I see around the house... Danu - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 695 Views
Not me. aerocontrols - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 697 Views
It worked this time! *NM* Monique - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 469 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* Camilla - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 330 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. Tim - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 1036 Views
That would have been very impressive Camilla - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 744 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. Tim - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 681 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes