Active Users:813 Time:06/08/2026 04:55:26 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM
It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.

If I start clicking through philosophy links on Wikipedia I'll spend the day there.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? Camilla - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 1209 Views
I did. Kaldric - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 897 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. MightyYT - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 811 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 384 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* MightyYT - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 405 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* jh - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 343 Views
Indeed Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 770 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd beetnemesis - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 791 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 403 Views
Me! Monique - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 1058 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 860 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 848 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... Camilla - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 826 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... moondog - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 778 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. Stephen - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 808 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. Tom - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 911 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* Helene - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 389 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* Aeryn - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 456 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM 383 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh Isaac - 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM 846 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago. Aemon - 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM 847 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM* Tom - 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM 356 Views
... *NM* Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 368 Views
*NM* globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 385 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 844 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 882 Views
Huh. Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 860 Views
Re: Huh. Camilla - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 889 Views
Random words I see around the house... Danu - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 812 Views
Not me. aerocontrols - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 815 Views
It worked this time! *NM* Monique - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 538 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* Camilla - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 385 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. Tim - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 1178 Views
That would have been very impressive Camilla - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 856 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. Tim - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 794 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes