Active Users:495 Time:02/05/2025 07:01:16 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM
It was fairly cool. I tested Sherlock Holmes, lilac, Terry Pratchett and Douglas Adams, and all came in between 10 and 24. And then someone seems to have sabotaged it by editing the mathematics pages, it seems, so now there is a loop.

If I start clicking through philosophy links on Wikipedia I'll spend the day there.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So, how many have tried the claim in today's xkcd text? Camilla - 25/05/2011 05:39:55 PM 1033 Views
I did. Kaldric - 25/05/2011 06:13:05 PM 727 Views
Apparently i have a different xkcd.. MightyYT - 25/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 656 Views
They're talking about the rollover text *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 25/05/2011 06:41:18 PM 307 Views
I never knew there was roll over text on xkcd. Yeah for more enjoyment of xkcd! *NM* MightyYT - 25/05/2011 07:18:27 PM 332 Views
So you've missed half the jokes on xkcd? *NM* jh - 25/05/2011 09:14:50 PM 268 Views
Indeed Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:00:38 PM 602 Views
Hahah oh wow! Rollover text is basically just as important to xkcd beetnemesis - 26/05/2011 04:41:42 AM 639 Views
Dang. The roll over is the best part in many cases. *NM* Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:44:43 PM 322 Views
Me! Monique - 25/05/2011 07:22:50 PM 816 Views
Yeah. Someone sabotaged the "Facts" article beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:29:45 PM 678 Views
I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... beetnemesis - 25/05/2011 07:28:48 PM 680 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... Camilla - 25/05/2011 10:58:02 PM 648 Views
Re: I did. For those who haven't read it, the claim is... moondog - 26/05/2011 02:42:10 AM 616 Views
Ferenc Puskas didn't work. Stephen - 25/05/2011 07:39:31 PM 624 Views
For the future, it would be helpful to cite what you're talking about. Not all of us read xkcd. Tom - 25/05/2011 08:23:15 PM 726 Views
If you find it retarded, why do you care? *NM* Helene - 25/05/2011 09:22:49 PM 311 Views
... only it isn't [retarded] *NM* Aeryn - 25/05/2011 10:23:59 PM 373 Views
It's gotten pretty bad. The science jokes are funny, but Randall doesn't know much of anything else. *NM* Ghavrel - 26/05/2011 01:18:19 AM 308 Views
Even the science jokes are kinda meh Isaac - 26/05/2011 01:43:22 AM 674 Views
I loved xkcd up until about a year ago. Aemon - 26/05/2011 04:07:04 AM 688 Views
I should have clarified that it did seem good a few years ago. I agree with that. *NM* Tom - 26/05/2011 04:55:37 AM 282 Views
... *NM* Camilla - 25/05/2011 11:27:59 PM 290 Views
*NM* globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:49 AM 312 Views
Took 23 or so clicks... globug0822 - 26/05/2011 06:50:01 AM 650 Views
I thought about it, but didn't dare. Joel - 26/05/2011 06:14:45 PM 718 Views
Huh. Hobo - 26/05/2011 07:50:31 PM 699 Views
Re: Huh. Camilla - 26/05/2011 09:21:26 PM 729 Views
Random words I see around the house... Danu - 26/05/2011 08:05:05 PM 642 Views
Not me. aerocontrols - 26/05/2011 11:18:57 PM 637 Views
It worked this time! *NM* Monique - 30/05/2011 10:10:47 PM 381 Views
Yes, I think someone fixed it back to the way it was. *NM* Camilla - 30/05/2011 10:12:29 PM 307 Views
At first I thought you meant today's comic. Tim - 30/05/2011 11:16:54 PM 962 Views
That would have been very impressive Camilla - 30/05/2011 11:42:35 PM 686 Views
Yes, I noticed the date shortly afterwards. Tim - 31/05/2011 08:42:27 AM 630 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes