Considering they protected the Church from being forced to perform gay marriages against it's will, and I don't recognize any marriage performed outside the Catholic Church anyway, this really doesn't change anything for me.
As far as I'm aware, attempts to force the Catholic Church or any other Church to perform marriages against its will - of divorced people, for instance - have never been successful before, so why would they be successful now?
Nothing is ever successful until it is. I like having the extra protection.
New York Senate approves same-sex marriage
- 25/06/2011 03:47:43 AM
1377 Views
I'm actually not opposed to this.
- 25/06/2011 03:48:32 PM
677 Views
I'm not sure why there was even any need for such explicit protection.
- 25/06/2011 04:04:47 PM
673 Views
Meh, you never know.
- 26/06/2011 12:58:37 AM
819 Views
so in your only Catholics are really married?
- 26/06/2011 12:04:07 AM
681 Views
Church Doctrine.
- 26/06/2011 12:57:39 AM
806 Views
That's patently wrong in that Orthodox weddings are explicitly recognized by the Church.
- 26/06/2011 02:42:00 PM
697 Views
Yeah okay...
- 26/06/2011 05:16:05 PM
735 Views
They are outside of the authority of Rome, and have, on occasion, excommunicated Popes.
- 27/06/2011 05:03:31 PM
705 Views
Seems fine to me
- 25/06/2011 05:44:30 PM
673 Views
Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 25/06/2011 09:37:28 PM
801 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 26/06/2011 03:11:06 AM
746 Views
Good luck telling that to the deeply religious right.
- 26/06/2011 03:20:04 AM
662 Views
I am a deeply religious member of the right, and I tell them that all the time *NM*
- 26/06/2011 03:30:14 AM
290 Views
After a number of years of gay marriage
- 26/06/2011 06:57:07 AM
640 Views
That's more or less true of virtually everything, not a great example
- 26/06/2011 07:09:03 AM
673 Views
People shouldn't turn their own religion and/or opinion into law
- 28/06/2011 07:33:48 PM
654 Views
I don't recall mentioning religion beyond confirming that I was religious
- 28/06/2011 08:22:51 PM
713 Views
I admit I wasn't replying to you directly
- 29/06/2011 07:20:10 AM
667 Views
I think you should give this subject a bit more thought
- 29/06/2011 02:16:04 PM
711 Views
Believing things without strong supporting evidence is not rational.
- 30/06/2011 12:11:33 AM
787 Views
Requiring different degrees of proof for things isn't particularly rational
- 30/06/2011 01:14:44 PM
859 Views
I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 07:43:51 PM
1253 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 08:59:00 PM
860 Views
Re: I require the same standard of evidence to be confident in anything.
- 30/06/2011 09:47:30 PM
1124 Views
No, I used the word irrational to mean that it's not rational.
- 30/06/2011 09:12:19 PM
700 Views
Re: Voting on civil rights constitutes tyranny of the majority, not legitimate democracy.
- 26/06/2011 10:38:56 PM
847 Views
I think you should give your fellow citizens a bit more trust and respect
- 27/06/2011 05:41:52 PM
645 Views
My expectations are guided by psychology and history.
- 28/06/2011 07:08:06 PM
759 Views
That's good to know, most of us do that, though we usually just call it common sense and experience
- 28/06/2011 08:55:23 PM
784 Views
No, most people don't do that. Reasoning from cognitive biases and anecdotes is much more common.
- 30/06/2011 12:18:40 AM
690 Views
Empire State Building was lit up in rainbow colors, looked cool *NM*
- 25/06/2011 08:21:03 PM
310 Views
I approved that years ago. They are way behind. Granted, I have no authority over anyone...
- 26/06/2011 12:22:33 AM
566 Views
The real issue is going to be when the Supreme Court rules on the full faith and credit clause.
- 26/06/2011 02:43:23 PM
676 Views