a few things came to mind.
First off...aren't you one of those who want to *force* me to buy health insurance? How is that different from a motorcycle helmet law?
Secondly...since when do we have a total "right" over our own bodies? Prostitution is illegal in most areas. Illicit drug use is illegal in all areas. You cannot sell one of your organs....you can't even sell your own blood. Abortion isn't about "her own body"...cause if you really want to get technical, none of her body is being removed. None of her DNA is in the tissue. Abortion is about who's rights are more important...the womans or the babies. Is it her convience or the babies right to live? That's the debate.
You're going on and on about majorities and minorities, but what I see more from your post is a spirit of rebellion. It has nothing to do with the fact that many or few people see a particular point of view, but more from the fact that you don't like to be told what to do.
~Jeordam
First off...aren't you one of those who want to *force* me to buy health insurance? How is that different from a motorcycle helmet law?
Secondly...since when do we have a total "right" over our own bodies? Prostitution is illegal in most areas. Illicit drug use is illegal in all areas. You cannot sell one of your organs....you can't even sell your own blood. Abortion isn't about "her own body"...cause if you really want to get technical, none of her body is being removed. None of her DNA is in the tissue. Abortion is about who's rights are more important...the womans or the babies. Is it her convience or the babies right to live? That's the debate.
You're going on and on about majorities and minorities, but what I see more from your post is a spirit of rebellion. It has nothing to do with the fact that many or few people see a particular point of view, but more from the fact that you don't like to be told what to do.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
- 05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
1046 Views
Kinda undermines his protest
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
307 Views
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
307 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
- 05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
678 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
- 05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
646 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
- 06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
577 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
- 06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
737 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
- 06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
855 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
- 06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
648 Views
*NM*
what a fricking idiot
- 05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
812 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
- 05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
1069 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
- 06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
530 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
- 06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
735 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
- 06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
795 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
- 06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
807 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
- 06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
972 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
- 06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
763 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
- 06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
919 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
- 06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
856 Views
Uh Joel...
- 06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
682 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
- 06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
758 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
731 Views
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
731 Views
Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
- 06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
591 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
- 06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
620 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
- 06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
1105 Views
Hold the phone here...
- 06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
1071 Views
+1 *NM*
- 06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
369 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
- 06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
755 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
- 06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
363 Views
It's really not.
- 07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
780 Views
i'm really not
- 07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
874 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
- 09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
828 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes.... 
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
844 Views
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
844 Views
See...that's the difference between you and me
- 06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
931 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
- 06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
917 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
- 06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
601 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
- 06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
622 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
- 07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
783 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
- 09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
780 Views