I could pick apart the entire post that you sent based upon plenty of things...and catch you in plenty of moral arguements where you are basically advocating for complete anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body. But I'm not going to do that.
Instead, I'll focus on one little phrase which you've said here (and a variation of what you've said before).
<snip> disgusting and immoral; that doesn't mean they should be illegal </snip>
This phrase was used in this case in regards to prostitution and organ sales. In other contex, you've used something along these lines before....
I have a real difficult time not legislating things that are disgusting and immoral. Why? Because not having rules against it is tantamount to endorsement. No law against beastality, means society is cool with it. No law against murder, means society is cool with it.
Do you see where I'm going with this? We live in a society where freedom is the default setting. Without being expressly told not to do it, it is permissable. Much like when driving (in California at least)...I can do a U-turn at any intersection....unless it tells me that I can't. Society functions much the same way. I can do whatever I want...unless there's a rule against it.
Oh, and I know/realize/understand about the whole love cannot be coerced thing. But please try and keep a barrier between the aspects of loving God and loving our society. You cannot approach the two in the same way....as God is without sin. Society, as evidenced over and over, is rife with sin.
~Jeordam
Instead, I'll focus on one little phrase which you've said here (and a variation of what you've said before).
<snip> disgusting and immoral; that doesn't mean they should be illegal </snip>
This phrase was used in this case in regards to prostitution and organ sales. In other contex, you've used something along these lines before....
I have a real difficult time not legislating things that are disgusting and immoral. Why? Because not having rules against it is tantamount to endorsement. No law against beastality, means society is cool with it. No law against murder, means society is cool with it.
Do you see where I'm going with this? We live in a society where freedom is the default setting. Without being expressly told not to do it, it is permissable. Much like when driving (in California at least)...I can do a U-turn at any intersection....unless it tells me that I can't. Society functions much the same way. I can do whatever I want...unless there's a rule against it.
Oh, and I know/realize/understand about the whole love cannot be coerced thing. But please try and keep a barrier between the aspects of loving God and loving our society. You cannot approach the two in the same way....as God is without sin. Society, as evidenced over and over, is rife with sin.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
- 1001 Views
Kinda undermines his protest
*NM*
05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
- 298 Views

How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
- 658 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
- 624 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
- 552 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
- 712 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
- 833 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
- 621 Views
what a fricking idiot
05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
- 790 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
- 1048 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
- 516 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
- 713 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
- 754 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
- 768 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
- 948 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
- 727 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
- 896 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
- 821 Views
Uh Joel...
06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
- 659 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
- 731 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
- 699 Views

Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
- 567 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
- 598 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
- 1082 Views
Hold the phone here...
06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
- 1028 Views
+1 *NM*
06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
- 360 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
- 732 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
- 355 Views
It's really not.
07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
- 758 Views
i'm really not
07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
- 832 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
- 801 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes....
06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
- 818 Views

See...that's the difference between you and me
06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
- 909 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
- 892 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
- 575 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
- 597 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
- 757 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
- 758 Views