This message last edited by eucatastrophe on 06/07/2011 at 11:44:36 PM
You can't make this stuff up: Helmet law protester dies in crash
- 05/07/2011 08:47:14 PM
1032 Views
Kinda undermines his protest
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
302 Views
*NM*
- 05/07/2011 09:01:50 PM
302 Views
How so? He wasn't demanding the right to survive crashes when only a helmet makes that possible.
- 05/07/2011 11:06:44 PM
666 Views
New York feels that people should have to wear helmets for their own safety
- 05/07/2011 11:20:36 PM
633 Views
He felt his own safety was his own concern.
- 06/07/2011 12:07:05 AM
561 Views
Who do you think would have ended up paying for his care for the rest of his life if the accident
- 06/07/2011 01:08:49 AM
724 Views
The same people who pay for everyone else whose actions render them vegetables.
- 06/07/2011 01:50:20 AM
843 Views
Maybe a more effective argument you could use against me would be pointing out
- 06/07/2011 02:33:21 AM
632 Views
Oops, ignore! *NM*
- 06/07/2011 11:44:10 PM
367 Views
*NM*
what a fricking idiot
- 05/07/2011 10:02:17 PM
800 Views
That's your opinion to which you're entitled.
- 05/07/2011 11:19:36 PM
1056 Views
Anarchy, baby! *NM*
- 06/07/2011 12:58:23 AM
521 Views
Sorry, as an advocate of civil rights (which especially includes minorities) I oppose anarchy.
- 06/07/2011 01:18:19 AM
721 Views
The public's nose is on the line here too.
- 06/07/2011 01:47:08 AM
781 Views
So my increased ease of hearing/seeing vehicles and other hazards isn't worth $1200.
- 06/07/2011 02:25:53 AM
788 Views
I understand the pov, I had a BF who felt that same way. It's still much like childish defiance.
- 06/07/2011 01:26:15 AM
958 Views
In part it's a matter of principle, but if we really want to analyze it there's some deeper validity
- 06/07/2011 02:13:05 AM
749 Views
you keep spreading falsehoods, stop it please
- 06/07/2011 02:49:01 AM
906 Views
Sounds like your real argument is with the other bikers; I'm just reiterating their arguments.
- 06/07/2011 03:38:39 AM
840 Views
Uh Joel...
- 06/07/2011 03:38:24 AM
667 Views
Agreed, having others in the car does make a difference.
- 06/07/2011 03:47:53 AM
741 Views
Hence why your "I wouldn't wear a seatbelt in the back seat" comment didn't make a lot of sense
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
711 Views
- 06/07/2011 07:38:50 PM
711 Views
Depends on whether the driver, rather than the law, is the one insisting.
- 06/07/2011 08:06:24 PM
576 Views
You'd place your own comfort over other people's safety?
- 06/07/2011 11:37:00 PM
607 Views
It's more a comfort issue than anything else; it's not solely one.
- 06/07/2011 11:56:28 PM
1090 Views
Hold the phone here...
- 06/07/2011 07:49:10 PM
1036 Views
+1 *NM*
- 06/07/2011 08:42:14 PM
365 Views
You agree with him that the abortion debate is about a mothers convenience versus the babys life?
- 06/07/2011 10:48:52 PM
740 Views
im not bringing abortion into this, its a separate issue *NM*
- 06/07/2011 10:56:17 PM
359 Views
It's really not.
- 07/07/2011 12:20:10 AM
766 Views
i'm really not
- 07/07/2011 03:34:23 PM
853 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but public/private only matters to the extent others are affected.
- 09/07/2011 11:15:33 AM
811 Views
Holding the phone here might be good, yes.... 
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
826 Views
- 06/07/2011 10:33:46 PM
826 Views
See...that's the difference between you and me
- 06/07/2011 10:56:53 PM
918 Views
Apparently so; "completely anarchy as long as its regulated to one's body" sounds nonsensical to me.
- 06/07/2011 11:44:50 PM
902 Views
I'm with Joel. I always buckle up/helmet up, but I think such laws are asinine
- 06/07/2011 02:30:04 AM
585 Views
why not just ban motorcycles all together, they are much more dangerous than cars
- 06/07/2011 05:39:51 PM
604 Views
Helmets help save lives. 'Onest.
- 07/07/2011 04:40:42 PM
768 Views
So do not smoking, eating right and regular exercise, but we haven't made them mandatory.
- 09/07/2011 11:04:58 AM
766 Views