I understand you but disagree, because I also understand plain English.
Joel Send a noteboard - 19/10/2011 02:06:23 AM
Hence I do not go around calling things unconstitutional when the SCOTUS has already ruled they are not. Speaking of the Constitution, however, between saying Social Security violates it, the 17th Amendment should be repealed and that we should create amendments to ban abortion and gay marriage, I think Perrys Radical Republican credentials are well established (the original Radical Republicans only amended the Constitution three times, not four.) I know TX amends its state Constitution as often as most people change shirts, but if Perry dislikes that many things about the federal Constitution maybe he should consider residency in a country without it rather than trying to screw up his native one.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 19/10/2011 at 02:09:57 AM
So I am curious. What do our site conservatives think of Cain?
- 18/10/2011 09:35:47 AM
1020 Views
I have trouble taking him seriously
- 18/10/2011 01:59:23 PM
706 Views
That is the problem with all Romneys opponents.
- 18/10/2011 03:32:50 PM
711 Views
what positions of Perry's do you consider radical?
- 18/10/2011 03:56:30 PM
604 Views
Well, abolishing Social Security is pretty far out there, and publicly threatening the Fed Chairman.
- 18/10/2011 04:50:03 PM
815 Views
yes but I was talkin about his actuall posistions not the made up stuff *NM*
- 18/10/2011 05:10:47 PM
334 Views
When the candidate "makes them up" they are positions.
- 18/10/2011 05:26:18 PM
622 Views
all you need to do is provide a link supporting your claim that Perry said he wants to abolish SS
- 18/10/2011 05:56:23 PM
558 Views
Really? Do you not watch the news? That's common knowledge *NM*
- 18/10/2011 06:04:06 PM
248 Views
I believe what RT means ...
- 18/10/2011 06:22:42 PM
596 Views
No it isn't a fine point
- 18/10/2011 06:48:00 PM
749 Views
He said he wants private retirement accounts instead, which is abolishing Social Security.
- 18/10/2011 10:44:33 PM
740 Views
Privatizing isn't the same as abolishing
- 18/10/2011 10:53:04 PM
666 Views
It is unless the governments role is more than "you MUST do this; figure out how on your own."
- 19/10/2011 12:10:25 AM
732 Views
Are you correcting yourself or qualifying your statement?
- 19/10/2011 06:30:34 AM
718 Views
Neither; laws requiring everyone do something do NOTHING themselves.
- 20/10/2011 10:10:31 AM
701 Views
The ALL CAPS stuff isn't helping to convince me that this isn't all kool-aid drenched hyperbole
- 20/10/2011 01:15:19 PM
656 Views
Some things are better off in private hands, but "natural dependcies" are not among those things.
- 20/10/2011 03:42:15 PM
783 Views
It is ridiculously simple; here ya go:
- 18/10/2011 08:15:24 PM
665 Views
OK he doesn't like it now give me the link where he wants to abolish it
- 18/10/2011 09:29:38 PM
597 Views
You see no conflict between this post and your next one? 
- 18/10/2011 10:16:21 PM
749 Views
- 18/10/2011 10:16:21 PM
749 Views
no I don't
- 18/10/2011 11:36:38 PM
678 Views
By his own statements he either wants to end it or violate the Constitution.
- 19/10/2011 12:13:33 AM
648 Views
you really excell at misunderstanding *NM*
- 19/10/2011 12:30:32 AM
272 Views
I understand you but disagree, because I also understand plain English.
- 19/10/2011 02:06:23 AM
746 Views
More qualified to be President than Obama was at this stage.
- 18/10/2011 07:40:33 PM
624 Views
I assume you're refering to his implemented policies of corporate welfare? *NM*
- 18/10/2011 07:46:07 PM
268 Views
He did say, "at this stage;" Obama has been a quick study at corporate welfare.
- 19/10/2011 01:19:39 AM
625 Views
So this is an "Anybody but Obama" election for you, then? *NM*
- 19/10/2011 12:16:46 AM
245 Views
I thought that was a given, the reason Republicans will swallow their bile/tongues and vote Romney.
- 19/10/2011 01:17:46 AM
658 Views
Not just anyone. That way lies more idiocy than ignoring lies and pandering.
- 19/10/2011 07:23:18 AM
761 Views
His speeches do have a clear socialist agenda; too bad none of his policies have a hint of one.
- 20/10/2011 10:25:01 AM
797 Views
Post-debate, my opinion is fairly unchanged
- 19/10/2011 06:35:32 AM
807 Views
Romney slapped Perry down so hard tonight. It was wonderful. 
- 19/10/2011 06:53:52 AM
693 Views
- 19/10/2011 06:53:52 AM
693 Views
It was that, I rather enjoyed it
- 19/10/2011 07:10:49 AM
642 Views
I promise
- 19/10/2011 10:33:49 AM
736 Views
I can see the buttons now: "Vote for... something... maybe...!"
- 20/10/2011 10:46:44 AM
1072 Views
...the words made sense by themselves, but when I put them together, meaning vanished.
- 20/10/2011 11:33:46 AM
611 Views
let me ask you this about Cain
- 19/10/2011 01:47:36 PM
731 Views
Why is that, would you think?
- 19/10/2011 06:29:53 PM
667 Views
There just seems to be strong lack of good choices
- 19/10/2011 06:50:25 PM
713 Views
I'm getting the same impression... not necessarily worse candidates, just more criticism.
- 19/10/2011 08:37:21 PM
845 Views
I blame the press
- 19/10/2011 09:05:36 PM
814 Views
It's rare that I agree with you so fully. Politics is the demesne of soundbites. *NM*
- 20/10/2011 12:38:48 AM
232 Views
I blame the public, and, to a lesser degree, Nielsen and Armitron.
- 20/10/2011 11:39:43 AM
725 Views