Active Users:80 Time:27/05/2016 01:13:51 AM
That is a logical and reasonable assessment. Joel Send a noteboard - 04/02/2012 08:59:59 PM
... that it's not surprising that racists and such are more likely to be drawn to conservative ideologies, but that's not because there's anything necessarily racist or wrong with those ideologies. Those who are prejudiced at their core don't like other people, particularly people who are different, and as such the conservative idea that people shouldn't have to use their own property to help support others would of course be more appealing. But that doesn't actually say anything about conservatism, nor about the many people who adhere to it who are not racists and such.

In the same manner, liberalism might more naturally appeal to those who have different sorts of flaws, let's say as a random unsupported example pedophiles, because there is support for the idea of rehabilitation rather than harsher punishments. That would not actually say anything about liberalism, nor about the many people who adhere to it who are not pedophiles.

In other words, a prediliction of one particular group to gravitate to one particular idea does not in and of itself associate that idea with that group. I mean, Hitler hated drinking and smoking, and I think he was right about that, but that doesn't make me a Nazi and it doesn't mean dislike of drinking and smoking means you support racial purity and martial power. The entire idea is ludicrous.

And if people with lower IQs are more attracted to conservatism, it could be as simple as conservatives being better at promotion and people with lower IQs being more susceptible to advertising. Once again I don't think there's anything that can actually be inferred about the positives or negatives of either conservatism or liberalism. Until someone can prove why a particular statistic or study result occurs, it doesn't have much bearing on real life and in this particular case is much more likely to simply be a political stick to wave about.

If I understood you correctly you are basically saying correlation is not causality. Fine as far as it goes, but if a disproportionate number of conservatives only adopted THAT philosophy because of either low intellect and/or its service of another far uglier one, that speaks very poorly of conservatism. If the vast majority of intelligent unbigoted people reject a position that is not an indictment of its morality, but certainly of its rationality.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
And conservative leaders actively recruiting adherents THROUGH bigotry IS a moral indictment.
Reply to message
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism - 03/02/2012 08:58:00 PM 754 Views
I think ... - 03/02/2012 09:28:02 PM 354 Views
I agree. - 03/02/2012 10:48:25 PM 248 Views
Yeah, I am unsure whether to be impressed or disappointed. - 05/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 365 Views
That is a logical and reasonable assessment. - 04/02/2012 08:59:59 PM 279 Views
You think very well. - 05/02/2012 04:12:11 AM 267 Views
note: "social conservatives", not "fiscal conservatives" - 03/02/2012 09:37:18 PM 334 Views
I've wondered: - 03/02/2012 09:55:14 PM 349 Views
It bothers the living fuck out of me - 03/02/2012 10:59:01 PM 302 Views
Just wait ten years - 03/02/2012 11:21:25 PM 248 Views
Oh, I still vote Republican. - 04/02/2012 01:49:43 AM 286 Views
Re: Oh, I still vote Republican. - 04/02/2012 01:15:10 PM 308 Views
Re: Just wait ten years - 04/02/2012 05:16:16 AM 246 Views
By referencing it… - 03/02/2012 10:50:59 PM 249 Views
That's an odd idea. - 03/02/2012 11:10:31 PM 352 Views
It was a mostly facetious comment…. - 03/02/2012 11:49:28 PM 237 Views
Clearly you endorse it. - 05/02/2012 02:23:41 AM 190 Views
Only endorsing its validity, not its soundness. *NM* - 04/02/2012 02:24:24 AM 134 Views
Tempting... - 03/02/2012 11:17:43 PM 309 Views
I expected no less. - 05/02/2012 12:25:14 AM 355 Views
Still fun though - 05/02/2012 01:30:26 AM 348 Views
Well, that is the main thing. - 05/02/2012 02:25:36 AM 353 Views
Well, racists are dumb. What's to discuss? - 04/02/2012 01:23:27 AM 261 Views
I think that generally agreed, though we need a study PROVING what we already know. - 05/02/2012 12:41:26 AM 364 Views
Proving is something you do in maths, not science. - 05/02/2012 09:05:30 AM 196 Views
So the Moon might still be made of green cheese? - 05/02/2012 10:20:57 AM 244 Views
Yes. It is not very likely, though, since no measurement we have done so far indicates that it is so - 05/02/2012 02:28:18 PM 195 Views
Oh, let us not go THERE. - 05/02/2012 02:54:30 PM 368 Views
Bad comparison - 05/02/2012 03:36:12 PM 250 Views
Well, that last part will make sure this gets ugly.... - 04/02/2012 02:05:11 AM 225 Views
Do you not think it's true then? - 04/02/2012 07:32:13 AM 354 Views
Same here *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:13:44 PM 125 Views
Not in my experience. - 04/02/2012 04:17:01 PM 292 Views
Granted, you do move in different circles than I (or Jens, for that matter.) - 04/02/2012 10:24:52 PM 285 Views
Corfirmational bias much? - 04/02/2012 04:25:24 PM 270 Views
I did mention that I didn't care enough to look into it. - 04/02/2012 10:22:09 PM 260 Views
As a few others have noted, it is important to preserve the causality chain. - 05/02/2012 02:35:02 AM 271 Views
I dont see that it matters. - 13/02/2012 01:40:45 AM 240 Views

Reply to Message