Active Users:134 Time:21/02/2018 08:45:03 AM
In terms of policy, it probably does not; in terms of demographics, it definitely does. Joel Send a noteboard - 13/02/2012 02:52:23 AM
As long as there is a link, does it matter if the chicken or egg came first?

If a majority of idiots are conservative, that says much about idiots, but little of conservatives. If there are for more conservatives than idiots, it only tells us stupid people will probably tip the balance when liberals and conservatives are near equilibrium, not that conservatives as whole tend to be stupid.

Think of it as a Venn diagram like any large demographic within a much larger general population. A majority of women are Democrats, but if that makes all Democrats women why has every Democratic president been male? A majority of white Protestant males are Republicans, but Clarence Thomas is a black Catholic.

In terms of policies, one reliant on "the stupid demographic" to win is probably unwise, or a majority of intelligent people would not support an opposing one. However, that does not make the policy itself, or most of its supporters, stupid. It just means the policys overall popularity depends on disproportionate support from stupid people IN ADDITION to intelligent supporters. The latter still number in the tens of millions; they are just less numerous than the other policys intelligent supporters.

So IF (a big "if" at present) other studies corroborate this general one, it would be a good argument against conservative policy. It would mean stupidity encourages conservatism, whose electoral success relies on that. It would NOT mean conservatism denotes stupidity, because a host of other unrelated things ALSO encourage conservatism, and a host of intelligent conservatives respond to those other factors.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism - 03/02/2012 08:58:00 PM 963 Views
I think ... - 03/02/2012 09:28:02 PM 522 Views
I agree. - 03/02/2012 10:48:25 PM 1259 Views
Yeah, I am unsure whether to be impressed or disappointed. - 05/02/2012 02:38:05 AM 1397 Views
That is a logical and reasonable assessment. - 04/02/2012 08:59:59 PM 1305 Views
You think very well. - 05/02/2012 04:12:11 AM 1259 Views
note: "social conservatives", not "fiscal conservatives" - 03/02/2012 09:37:18 PM 1308 Views
I've wondered: - 03/02/2012 09:55:14 PM 1317 Views
It bothers the living fuck out of me - 03/02/2012 10:59:01 PM 1279 Views
Just wait ten years - 03/02/2012 11:21:25 PM 1161 Views
Oh, I still vote Republican. - 04/02/2012 01:49:43 AM 1208 Views
Re: Oh, I still vote Republican. - 04/02/2012 01:15:10 PM 1238 Views
Re: Just wait ten years - 04/02/2012 05:16:16 AM 1220 Views
By referencing it… - 03/02/2012 10:50:59 PM 1208 Views
That's an odd idea. - 03/02/2012 11:10:31 PM 1268 Views
It was a mostly facetious comment…. - 03/02/2012 11:49:28 PM 633 Views
Clearly you endorse it. - 05/02/2012 02:23:41 AM 307 Views
Only endorsing its validity, not its soundness. *NM* - 04/02/2012 02:24:24 AM 236 Views
Tempting... - 03/02/2012 11:17:43 PM 498 Views
I expected no less. - 05/02/2012 12:25:14 AM 530 Views
Still fun though - 05/02/2012 01:30:26 AM 528 Views
Well, that is the main thing. - 05/02/2012 02:25:36 AM 513 Views
Well, racists are dumb. What's to discuss? - 04/02/2012 01:23:27 AM 364 Views
I think that generally agreed, though we need a study PROVING what we already know. - 05/02/2012 12:41:26 AM 591 Views
Proving is something you do in maths, not science. - 05/02/2012 09:05:30 AM 329 Views
So the Moon might still be made of green cheese? - 05/02/2012 10:20:57 AM 407 Views
Yes. It is not very likely, though, since no measurement we have done so far indicates that it is so - 05/02/2012 02:28:18 PM 278 Views
Oh, let us not go THERE. - 05/02/2012 02:54:30 PM 519 Views
Bad comparison - 05/02/2012 03:36:12 PM 380 Views
Well, that last part will make sure this gets ugly.... - 04/02/2012 02:05:11 AM 262 Views
Do you not think it's true then? - 04/02/2012 07:32:13 AM 515 Views
Same here *NM* - 04/02/2012 12:13:44 PM 158 Views
Not in my experience. - 04/02/2012 04:17:01 PM 455 Views
Granted, you do move in different circles than I (or Jens, for that matter.) - 04/02/2012 10:24:52 PM 408 Views
Corfirmational bias much? - 04/02/2012 04:25:24 PM 394 Views
I did mention that I didn't care enough to look into it. - 04/02/2012 10:22:09 PM 406 Views
As a few others have noted, it is important to preserve the causality chain. - 05/02/2012 02:35:02 AM 372 Views
I dont see that it matters. - 13/02/2012 01:40:45 AM 407 Views
In terms of policy, it probably does not; in terms of demographics, it definitely does. - 13/02/2012 02:52:23 AM 483 Views

Reply to Message