Lord knows there appears to be a serious uptick in louder more insulting and obnoxious atheists in the last few years but that still doesn't mean those specific people represent the entire group anymore than Fred Phelps represents Christianity or PETA represents those of us who believe in humane treatment of animals. When I was an atheist those sorts got on my nerves same as Phelps and PETA do now. Do keep in mind that the lion's share of those sorts are utterly indistinguishable from the same group of obnoxious, arrogant, and usually young and socially incompetent people who show up in any religion, faith, ideology, cause, etc. You don't really need to egg them on by giving them a legit beef, because like anyone else they will never remember when they've done the same thing to other people. There are also a number of atheists here who aren't thin-skinned hypocrites who probably won't appreciate your having just insulted them, and considering you just took a swipe at most of us who are part of organized religions with the ' invent a bunch of nonsensical rules to live by and then try to force other people to adopt my rules' comment, you've pretty much managed to slap everyone but agnostics in the face, and having been one of those too I can't say I'd have approved of that either.
It's very important to be sensitive to other peoples feelings on religious matters, it keeps us all from butchering each other. Many atheists get knocked, and often rightfully so, for having an attitude that comes off as 'everyone who disagrees with me is wrong and stupid' but you essentially just did the same thing while adding in the caveat 'but it's okay to disagree with me, it's not your fault you're stupid' then making a point of telling them you deliberately like to insult people to bait them.
It's very important to be sensitive to other peoples feelings on religious matters, it keeps us all from butchering each other. Many atheists get knocked, and often rightfully so, for having an attitude that comes off as 'everyone who disagrees with me is wrong and stupid' but you essentially just did the same thing while adding in the caveat 'but it's okay to disagree with me, it's not your fault you're stupid' then making a point of telling them you deliberately like to insult people to bait them.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Do you know the best way to anger an atheist?
- 28/02/2012 07:10:57 PM
2092 Views
Or, you could baptize one of them, posthumously.
- 28/02/2012 07:32:48 PM
1414 Views
I can't think of any reason for an atheist to be annoyed by that.
- 28/02/2012 11:08:44 PM
1146 Views
Well, for starters, it's really effing rude.
- 28/02/2012 11:31:36 PM
1218 Views
It is an act of love.
- 29/02/2012 12:34:03 AM
1212 Views
Everyone does it for that reason? (edits for clarity)
- 29/02/2012 10:27:02 AM
1095 Views
I have some disturbing news for you...
- 29/02/2012 06:42:41 PM
1128 Views
For anyone reading this: the guy above is wrong, and I am admitting that to you on his behalf, so
- 29/02/2012 07:15:38 PM
1175 Views
Maybe without realizing it, you have articulated....
- 29/02/2012 07:24:13 PM
990 Views
I actually find that conversation quite interesting.
- 29/02/2012 08:18:35 PM
1108 Views
Re: I actually find that conversation quite interesting.
- 29/02/2012 09:07:06 PM
1179 Views
I cannot possibly agree more with these two paragraphs of yours...
- 29/02/2012 09:28:09 PM
1165 Views
I find the Fall perhaps the most interesting part.
- 02/03/2012 09:05:29 AM
1567 Views
Re: I find the Fall perhaps the most interesting part.
- 02/03/2012 06:26:06 PM
1347 Views
There are 3 critical distinctions: 1) Ability to sin, 2) Awareness of sin and 3) Appreciation of sin
- 05/03/2012 04:08:36 AM
1102 Views
It is not an act of love to defy the beliefs of a loved one.
- 29/02/2012 02:32:45 PM
1244 Views
Rape? That is ridiculous.
- 29/02/2012 05:26:13 PM
1172 Views
It's a bit of hyperbole, but not too far from it, imo
- 29/02/2012 05:45:39 PM
1170 Views
"Spiritual rape" might be going a bit far, but otherwise that sounds about right.
- 02/03/2012 08:06:48 AM
1239 Views
Isn't religion different than faith, though?
- 28/02/2012 07:44:07 PM
1206 Views
Yeah that's pretty much what I said
- 28/02/2012 08:21:56 PM
1010 Views
- 28/02/2012 08:21:56 PM
1010 Views
Generally the same way you piss off anyone else
- 28/02/2012 08:43:04 PM
1123 Views
that won't work on Buddists
- 28/02/2012 09:21:48 PM
1153 Views
For some reason I always imagine Buddhists as the monk class on RPG games... *NM*
- 28/02/2012 10:13:27 PM
568 Views
That's always been my view of the issue. Half-assed non-religious types are just as obnoxious too.
- 28/02/2012 10:34:12 PM
1370 Views
Seems a got both a pat on the back and a scathing rebuke. I call that a good day
- 28/02/2012 11:57:45 PM
1428 Views
Best way to anger an atheist, by declaring all atheists are the same. *NM*
- 28/02/2012 10:38:51 PM
699 Views
Common error number 1: "Atheism isn't a lack of belief, but rather a belief that God doesn't exist."
- 28/02/2012 11:18:23 PM
1318 Views
Curiously, anger at statements of simple obvious facts is a hallmark of religious fundamentalism.
- 29/02/2012 10:27:29 AM
1245 Views
- 29/02/2012 10:27:29 AM
1245 Views
What you're doing there is defining "atheist" and "agnostic" in a way that suits you, but...
- 29/02/2012 11:50:27 AM
1031 Views
What I am doing is using the terms as they were universally used until about the time I was born.
- 05/03/2012 01:11:21 AM
1167 Views
So what do you call this position?:
- 05/03/2012 08:43:20 AM
1133 Views
I call them both agnostic, but the former leans toward atheism while the latter has no lean.
- 05/03/2012 10:53:02 AM
1216 Views
See, there you go again, defining atheism in such a way as to make it sound ridiculous.
- 05/03/2012 11:21:17 AM
1003 Views
Well, is unswerving belief a good thing, or not?
- 05/03/2012 11:57:05 AM
1232 Views
What's happening
- 05/03/2012 02:24:41 PM
1242 Views
Conversationally, DKs use of "atheism" at the start of this convo is the only practical definition.
- 07/03/2012 03:10:18 AM
1545 Views
Oh really? The guy who was doing it to annoy people?
- 07/03/2012 09:53:38 PM
1124 Views
The guy who was doing it to annoy atheists based on the terms technical and popular meaning, yes.
- 11/03/2012 04:04:36 AM
1015 Views
Whatever.
- 12/03/2012 12:39:24 AM
1504 Views
I understand that as "I completely agree."
- 13/03/2012 12:11:18 AM
1300 Views
- 13/03/2012 12:11:18 AM
1300 Views
I have known very few people who "believe" their religion from rearing and actually understand it.
- 29/02/2012 12:08:01 PM
1364 Views
I thought that was "best way to make an atheist roll his/her eyes at you"? *NM*
- 29/02/2012 11:05:21 PM
732 Views

*NM*