And by your logic simply having convictions different from others is condescending or presumptuous. If someone is a believing Hindu, by definition they believe you are wrong if you subscribe to Christian doctrine, or if you are a Muslim, etc...
That is not true, and is not what either of us is saying. They are free to think I'm wrong - that alone doesn't spell condescension. Treating me as though I've made the wrong choices and deciding to make different decisions on my behalf is condescension. Blatantly.
Do you know the best way to anger an atheist?
- 28/02/2012 07:10:57 PM
2207 Views
Or, you could baptize one of them, posthumously.
- 28/02/2012 07:32:48 PM
1532 Views
I can't think of any reason for an atheist to be annoyed by that.
- 28/02/2012 11:08:44 PM
1243 Views
Well, for starters, it's really effing rude.
- 28/02/2012 11:31:36 PM
1331 Views
It is an act of love.
- 29/02/2012 12:34:03 AM
1314 Views
Everyone does it for that reason? (edits for clarity)
- 29/02/2012 10:27:02 AM
1206 Views
I have some disturbing news for you...
- 29/02/2012 06:42:41 PM
1249 Views
For anyone reading this: the guy above is wrong, and I am admitting that to you on his behalf, so
- 29/02/2012 07:15:38 PM
1285 Views
Maybe without realizing it, you have articulated....
- 29/02/2012 07:24:13 PM
1096 Views
I actually find that conversation quite interesting.
- 29/02/2012 08:18:35 PM
1227 Views
Re: I actually find that conversation quite interesting.
- 29/02/2012 09:07:06 PM
1282 Views
I cannot possibly agree more with these two paragraphs of yours...
- 29/02/2012 09:28:09 PM
1283 Views
I find the Fall perhaps the most interesting part.
- 02/03/2012 09:05:29 AM
1680 Views
Re: I find the Fall perhaps the most interesting part.
- 02/03/2012 06:26:06 PM
1456 Views
There are 3 critical distinctions: 1) Ability to sin, 2) Awareness of sin and 3) Appreciation of sin
- 05/03/2012 04:08:36 AM
1205 Views
It is not an act of love to defy the beliefs of a loved one.
- 29/02/2012 02:32:45 PM
1360 Views
Rape? That is ridiculous.
- 29/02/2012 05:26:13 PM
1271 Views
It's a bit of hyperbole, but not too far from it, imo
- 29/02/2012 05:45:39 PM
1279 Views
"Spiritual rape" might be going a bit far, but otherwise that sounds about right.
- 02/03/2012 08:06:48 AM
1352 Views
Isn't religion different than faith, though?
- 28/02/2012 07:44:07 PM
1307 Views
Yeah that's pretty much what I said
- 28/02/2012 08:21:56 PM
1112 Views
- 28/02/2012 08:21:56 PM
1112 Views
that won't work on Buddists
- 28/02/2012 09:21:48 PM
1267 Views
For some reason I always imagine Buddhists as the monk class on RPG games... *NM*
- 28/02/2012 10:13:27 PM
624 Views
That's always been my view of the issue. Half-assed non-religious types are just as obnoxious too.
- 28/02/2012 10:34:12 PM
1483 Views
Seems a got both a pat on the back and a scathing rebuke. I call that a good day
- 28/02/2012 11:57:45 PM
1566 Views
Best way to anger an atheist, by declaring all atheists are the same. *NM*
- 28/02/2012 10:38:51 PM
753 Views
Common error number 1: "Atheism isn't a lack of belief, but rather a belief that God doesn't exist."
- 28/02/2012 11:18:23 PM
1442 Views
Curiously, anger at statements of simple obvious facts is a hallmark of religious fundamentalism.
- 29/02/2012 10:27:29 AM
1356 Views
- 29/02/2012 10:27:29 AM
1356 Views
What you're doing there is defining "atheist" and "agnostic" in a way that suits you, but...
- 29/02/2012 11:50:27 AM
1131 Views
What I am doing is using the terms as they were universally used until about the time I was born.
- 05/03/2012 01:11:21 AM
1288 Views
So what do you call this position?:
- 05/03/2012 08:43:20 AM
1233 Views
I call them both agnostic, but the former leans toward atheism while the latter has no lean.
- 05/03/2012 10:53:02 AM
1328 Views
See, there you go again, defining atheism in such a way as to make it sound ridiculous.
- 05/03/2012 11:21:17 AM
1107 Views
Well, is unswerving belief a good thing, or not?
- 05/03/2012 11:57:05 AM
1330 Views
What's happening
- 05/03/2012 02:24:41 PM
1347 Views
Conversationally, DKs use of "atheism" at the start of this convo is the only practical definition.
- 07/03/2012 03:10:18 AM
1661 Views
Oh really? The guy who was doing it to annoy people?
- 07/03/2012 09:53:38 PM
1250 Views
The guy who was doing it to annoy atheists based on the terms technical and popular meaning, yes.
- 11/03/2012 04:04:36 AM
1131 Views
Whatever.
- 12/03/2012 12:39:24 AM
1622 Views
I understand that as "I completely agree."
- 13/03/2012 12:11:18 AM
1414 Views
- 13/03/2012 12:11:18 AM
1414 Views
I have known very few people who "believe" their religion from rearing and actually understand it.
- 29/02/2012 12:08:01 PM
1485 Views
I thought that was "best way to make an atheist roll his/her eyes at you"? *NM*
- 29/02/2012 11:05:21 PM
790 Views

*NM*