It's a question of personal freedom versus human life. If it's a human life, bad decisions by one or more of the parents do not obviate it's right to live. If it is not a human life, than it is absolutely no one's business what the woman does with it. If you support abortion in the case of rape, you should support all abortion.

This modern fad of admiring the middle ground as if there is some sort of inherent holiness in compromise leads idiots like Atkin to embrace such moronic rationalizations. While a case could be made for discussion of the legitimacy of a rape claim, as well as the near-certainty that if exceptions to abortion bans are made for rape, some skanks WILL lie about being raped to obtain the waiver, this tool brought up those concepts in the absolute worst way possible. And it's all irrelevant anyway, because if you believe that fetus is a baby, you have no business permitting it to be murdered because of the circumstances of its genesis.

And how is the British guy wrong? If you don't want to get raped, don't take off your clothes and let a strange man or casual acquaintance take off his clothes in close proximity on the same piece of furniture. Of course, the corollary of that is that you shouldn't be sticking it in a chick you can't trust if you want to avoid false accusations of rape...