Ultimately, the frequent difficulty of establishing rape
I go into this a bit in my reply to Roland00. to be just that is just one more reason goverment should not usurp control over peoples bodies.
I'd phrase more as "the frequent difficulty of establishing rape is one more reason government should not be granting exceptions to take a human life." I suppose it all comes down to the life vs privacy issue. From the standpoint of human life, the complications of demonstrating rape is a good reason not to start making excuses for taking life for convenience (which is all that abortion ever is).What I can't get is the seeming disconnect in some people's minds between the authority of the government over people's bodies and the provisions they are supposed to offer for the same. How can someone say "my body, my choice" and at the same time support the government funding repairs or improvements to that same body? The excuse for the government takeover of GM was that since the government was bailing them out, the government had a right to ensure their money was spent properly. The natural extension of this logic is where the "death panels" came up, despite the disingenuous claims of Obama's supporters that there was no such wording or explicit provision in the bill or for that matter, any serious proposal for government-provided medical treatment funds. The fact is, funding life or death treatments ultimately gives the government authority over the receipt of those treatments, and thus the power over life and death.
The only viable choices are ceding the government control over your body, having the government write everyone a blank check for any sort of medicine, care or treatment they wish, or removing the government from all involvement with "life" except the elementary function of protecting people from assult, abuse and murder at one another's hands.
I do find it interesting, given the other serious charges flying both ways this year, that Akins ambiguous comment may be what costs the GOP a Senate majority.
It serves them right, because from a consitutional perspective, this is not remotely the concern of a Representative or a Senator. At most, you might say it's an issue because the Senate approves SCotUS appointees, but it is not properly a SCotUS issue either. The real position (and the official position of the GOP prior to the neocon mentality gaining prominence) should be that abortion is a state by state issue, and barring a Constitutional Amendment one way or another, completely beyond consideration of the federal government.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off
22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM
- 1080 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest.
22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM
- 650 Views
That is second on my list of things I remember about him, probably down to third now.
22/08/2012 11:21:17 PM
- 570 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate
23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM
- 618 Views
Bullshit
23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM
- 522 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway
23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM
- 545 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic.
23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM
- 786 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments
24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM
- 479 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way.
24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM
- 545 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too
24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM
- 557 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led.
24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM
- 637 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary
24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM
- 590 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either.
24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM
- 761 Views
I'm not even sure what that means
25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM
- 483 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads.
25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM
- 555 Views
Okay, we're done here
26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM
- 518 Views
Quotes are not my opinion.
26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM
- 491 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education.
26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM
- 584 Views
Further post-secondary education, you mean; probably so, though not for the reasons you stated.
26/08/2012 08:20:45 PM
- 536 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually?
27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM
- 613 Views
It has nothing to do with consequences or responsibility. It's about life & privacy. Period
23/08/2012 12:04:55 PM
- 641 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments.
23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM
- 606 Views
Really? *NM*
23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM
- 340 Views
Yeah.
23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM
- 547 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response.
23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM
- 541 Views
Heh, I didn't think so.
23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM
- 587 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context.
23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM
- 678 Views
Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM
- 493 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM
- 522 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM
- 498 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries.
23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM
- 527 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air
23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM
- 569 Views
This
23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM
- 574 Views
Eh
23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM
- 512 Views
I read it the same way Jen did
23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM
- 480 Views
Why?
23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM
- 562 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it.
23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM
- 555 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely.
23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM
- 522 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule.
23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM
- 538 Views
Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM
- 507 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM
- 474 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM
- 483 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM
- 581 Views
couple things
24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM
- 484 Views
Re: couple things
24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM
- 518 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange.
24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM
- 496 Views
I can
23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM
- 455 Views
OK
23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM
- 501 Views
Bullshit.
23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM
- 467 Views
Re: Bullshit.
23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
- 661 Views
Agreeing without agreeing.
23/08/2012 12:24:10 PM
- 582 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets
23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM
- 575 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit
23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM
- 495 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned
24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM
- 496 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well.
24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM
- 544 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate.
24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM
- 701 Views
Interesting.
24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM
- 485 Views
Yeah, that about covers it; personally, I am developing a grudging respect for Akin.
24/08/2012 06:30:43 AM
- 544 Views
no it isn't kinda true
24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM
- 466 Views
The MO GOP voters who nominated him for being "most conservative" think it is.
25/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
- 503 Views