Ultimately, the frequent difficulty of establishing rape
I go into this a bit in my reply to Roland00. to be just that is just one more reason goverment should not usurp control over peoples bodies.
I'd phrase more as "the frequent difficulty of establishing rape is one more reason government should not be granting exceptions to take a human life." I suppose it all comes down to the life vs privacy issue. From the standpoint of human life, the complications of demonstrating rape is a good reason not to start making excuses for taking life for convenience (which is all that abortion ever is).What I can't get is the seeming disconnect in some people's minds between the authority of the government over people's bodies and the provisions they are supposed to offer for the same. How can someone say "my body, my choice" and at the same time support the government funding repairs or improvements to that same body? The excuse for the government takeover of GM was that since the government was bailing them out, the government had a right to ensure their money was spent properly. The natural extension of this logic is where the "death panels" came up, despite the disingenuous claims of Obama's supporters that there was no such wording or explicit provision in the bill or for that matter, any serious proposal for government-provided medical treatment funds. The fact is, funding life or death treatments ultimately gives the government authority over the receipt of those treatments, and thus the power over life and death.
The only viable choices are ceding the government control over your body, having the government write everyone a blank check for any sort of medicine, care or treatment they wish, or removing the government from all involvement with "life" except the elementary function of protecting people from assult, abuse and murder at one another's hands.
I do find it interesting, given the other serious charges flying both ways this year, that Akins ambiguous comment may be what costs the GOP a Senate majority.
It serves them right, because from a consitutional perspective, this is not remotely the concern of a Representative or a Senator. At most, you might say it's an issue because the Senate approves SCotUS appointees, but it is not properly a SCotUS issue either. The real position (and the official position of the GOP prior to the neocon mentality gaining prominence) should be that abortion is a state by state issue, and barring a Constitutional Amendment one way or another, completely beyond consideration of the federal government.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off
22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM
- 1054 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest.
22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM
- 625 Views
That is second on my list of things I remember about him, probably down to third now.
22/08/2012 11:21:17 PM
- 545 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate
23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM
- 595 Views
Bullshit
23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM
- 500 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway
23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM
- 518 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic.
23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM
- 750 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments
24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM
- 452 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way.
24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM
- 521 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too
24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM
- 536 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led.
24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM
- 617 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary
24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM
- 569 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either.
24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM
- 731 Views
I'm not even sure what that means
25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM
- 462 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads.
25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM
- 524 Views
Okay, we're done here
26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM
- 494 Views
Quotes are not my opinion.
26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM
- 468 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education.
26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM
- 557 Views
Further post-secondary education, you mean; probably so, though not for the reasons you stated.
26/08/2012 08:20:45 PM
- 513 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually?
27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM
- 585 Views
It has nothing to do with consequences or responsibility. It's about life & privacy. Period
23/08/2012 12:04:55 PM
- 620 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments.
23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM
- 577 Views
Really? *NM*
23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM
- 329 Views
Yeah.
23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM
- 525 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response.
23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM
- 519 Views
Heh, I didn't think so.
23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM
- 563 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context.
23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM
- 653 Views
Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM
- 473 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM
- 501 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM
- 477 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries.
23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM
- 501 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air
23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM
- 545 Views
This
23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM
- 549 Views
Eh
23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM
- 494 Views
I read it the same way Jen did
23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM
- 461 Views
Why?
23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM
- 539 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it.
23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM
- 527 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely.
23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM
- 502 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule.
23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM
- 513 Views
Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM
- 487 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM
- 453 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM
- 458 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM
- 557 Views
couple things
24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM
- 465 Views
Re: couple things
24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM
- 498 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange.
24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM
- 472 Views
I can
23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM
- 434 Views
OK
23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM
- 476 Views
Bullshit.
23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM
- 446 Views
Re: Bullshit.
23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
- 638 Views
Agreeing without agreeing.
23/08/2012 12:24:10 PM
- 561 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets
23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM
- 554 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit
23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM
- 474 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned
24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM
- 472 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well.
24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM
- 526 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate.
24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM
- 673 Views
Interesting.
24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM
- 463 Views
Yeah, that about covers it; personally, I am developing a grudging respect for Akin.
24/08/2012 06:30:43 AM
- 519 Views
no it isn't kinda true
24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM
- 443 Views
The MO GOP voters who nominated him for being "most conservative" think it is.
25/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
- 477 Views