McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate.
Joel Send a noteboard - 24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM
The Republican Party has asked him to step out of the race and they are refusing to give him any support or money. The only one who wants him in the race is the democrats because it gives them the opportunity to have some manufactured outrage to distract from their failures and the media is happy to play along. One thing that is being ignored by the media is that the democrats spent 1.5 million to help him win so the same people who are the most shocked and offended by his comments are partially responsible for him even being in the race and if he wins they have no one to blame but themselves.
The Democrats are definitely happy to have Akin in the spotlight as long as possible- he's basically the iconic capstone to a year of escalating "Republicans vs. Women" incidents- but what's that about them spending money to help him win?
It actually has been reported pretty widely, and was at the time. It was also unethical, IMHO, but hard to get worked up about since it also happens to be true. McCaskill decided the most radical Republican gave her the best shot in a hopeless re-election campaign and, since the GOP base demands them, primary ads calling the most radical Republican just that were a win-win: If he won she would face the weakest opponent after months of defining him as a radical, about the only chance she had. The latest polls I have seen show she STILL trails by a couple points.
Anyway, that is the meat of it as I understand it. It was crass electioneering, but completely truthful. If the GOP base in a swing state responded to "he is the most conservative" with "THAT'S OUR GUY!" maybe Dem claims he reflects the whole party have merit.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 24/08/2012 at 04:15:23 AM
Rape - British left wing politician takes on American right wing politician in stupidest comment off
- 22/08/2012 11:03:50 PM
1080 Views
Galloway - I'll always remember him for being a Cat to be honest.
- 22/08/2012 11:14:58 PM
649 Views
That is second on my list of things I remember about him, probably down to third now.
- 22/08/2012 11:21:17 PM
570 Views
People who support abortion only for rape are the most retarded in the whole debate
- 23/08/2012 01:05:17 AM
618 Views
Bullshit
- 23/08/2012 05:01:24 AM
521 Views
That's an interesting variation with some legitimacy, though not compelling, to me anyway
- 23/08/2012 07:25:50 AM
544 Views
That is a dangerous line of logic.
- 23/08/2012 09:26:25 PM
780 Views
Okay, that really wasn't connected to my comments
- 24/08/2012 02:39:21 AM
478 Views
Sure it was, but we can do it your way.
- 24/08/2012 04:10:37 AM
544 Views
Yet you don't, you jump the gun here too
- 24/08/2012 04:37:02 AM
556 Views
I was trying to cut to the chase; like I say, I followed your logic: I just disliked where it led.
- 24/08/2012 06:10:40 AM
636 Views
Disliking the conclusion doesn't invalidate the logic, and stop veering out of the debate boundary
- 24/08/2012 06:43:43 AM
589 Views
No, the logics invalidity does that, though you do not seem to like its conclusion either.
- 24/08/2012 07:48:21 AM
760 Views
I'm not even sure what that means
- 25/08/2012 12:38:56 AM
482 Views
The logic is invalid because invalid, however either of us feels about where it leads.
- 25/08/2012 10:37:34 PM
555 Views
Okay, we're done here
- 26/08/2012 05:36:28 AM
518 Views
Quotes are not my opinion.
- 26/08/2012 06:37:19 AM
490 Views
You'd really benefit from post-secondary education.
- 26/08/2012 12:14:02 PM
583 Views
Further post-secondary education, you mean; probably so, though not for the reasons you stated.
- 26/08/2012 08:20:45 PM
536 Views
Haven't you and Joel had about the same amount of post-secondary education, actually?
- 27/08/2012 01:31:43 AM
612 Views
It has nothing to do with consequences or responsibility. It's about life & privacy. Period
- 23/08/2012 12:04:55 PM
640 Views
To be honest, I think people MIGHT be overreacting to both comments.
- 23/08/2012 01:33:54 AM
605 Views
Really? *NM*
- 23/08/2012 06:33:46 AM
339 Views
Yeah.
- 23/08/2012 06:40:05 AM
546 Views
I expect it is more of a "stating the obvious" response.
- 23/08/2012 02:01:18 PM
541 Views
Heh, I didn't think so.
- 23/08/2012 05:44:55 PM
586 Views
I said Akins comments needed MORE context.
- 23/08/2012 08:50:09 PM
677 Views
Yes, I saw that.
- 23/08/2012 10:28:50 PM
492 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
- 23/08/2012 11:04:40 PM
522 Views
Re: Yes, I saw that.
- 23/08/2012 11:08:46 PM
497 Views
Science sometimes produces shocking discoveries.
- 23/08/2012 11:28:47 PM
527 Views
And sometimes one doctor with an agenda pulls "facts" out of the air
- 23/08/2012 11:37:37 PM
568 Views
This
- 23/08/2012 08:50:43 PM
574 Views
Eh
- 23/08/2012 10:37:15 PM
512 Views
I read it the same way Jen did
- 23/08/2012 08:49:16 PM
479 Views
Why?
- 23/08/2012 08:51:59 PM
561 Views
See your reply here - the bit before the comma then the bit after it.
- 23/08/2012 09:06:20 PM
554 Views
You can see where there's room for doubt in that though, surely.
- 23/08/2012 09:20:19 PM
521 Views
I accept there are exceptions under some circumstances - but they are exceptions, not the rule.
- 23/08/2012 09:44:36 PM
538 Views
Well, I have to clarify...
- 23/08/2012 10:28:13 PM
506 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
- 23/08/2012 10:50:59 PM
473 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
- 23/08/2012 11:15:50 PM
483 Views
Re: Well, I have to clarify...
- 23/08/2012 11:28:56 PM
580 Views
couple things
- 24/08/2012 01:57:04 AM
484 Views
Re: couple things
- 24/08/2012 02:26:23 PM
518 Views
You may be talking about Galloway and not Assange, but Galloway was talking about Assange.
- 24/08/2012 06:28:00 PM
495 Views
I can
- 23/08/2012 11:05:05 PM
454 Views
OK
- 23/08/2012 09:35:35 PM
500 Views
Bullshit.
- 23/08/2012 10:00:54 PM
466 Views
Re: Bullshit.
- 23/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
660 Views
I don't know about Galloway but Akin is being made to pay for his commnets
- 23/08/2012 04:37:12 PM
574 Views
Um, I'm not sure about that last bit
- 23/08/2012 10:43:15 PM
494 Views
this issue has been discussed none stop for two days and this almost never mentioned
- 24/08/2012 12:28:25 PM
496 Views
Yeah, I'm curious about that last point as well.
- 24/08/2012 02:53:43 AM
544 Views
McCaskills campaign ran ads during the GOP primary calling Akin the "most conservative" candidate.
- 24/08/2012 03:33:18 AM
701 Views
Interesting.
- 24/08/2012 04:49:51 AM
484 Views
Yeah, that about covers it; personally, I am developing a grudging respect for Akin.
- 24/08/2012 06:30:43 AM
543 Views
no it isn't kinda true
- 24/08/2012 12:50:53 PM
466 Views
The MO GOP voters who nominated him for being "most conservative" think it is.
- 25/08/2012 10:52:02 PM
502 Views