Perhaps their switching of the subject had lost me by that point but my disagreement with Paul was with the fact what he seemed to say as a general point, not linked to either Galloway's stupid comments not the actual Assange case.
As I understood it, he was arguing that once someone had given consent to sex, had sex then gone to sleep, the other person was still fine to start having sex with them again several hours later with out attempting to find out if sex was wanted then. Perhaps I have misunderstood though but to me there is no grey area there - the consented to sex is over and done with when the couple stop having it.