Active Users:611 Time:13/12/2025 07:25:28 PM
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) imlad Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
"Submarines: 150 men go down, 75 couples come up."

But when we learned that the Navy (this was back in '04) was considering commissioning subs for women only crews, I amended it to

"Submarines: 150 women go down, and go down again, and again, and again."

My lesbian friends loved that one (these were the girls that told me the joke "What do lesbians bring with them on the second date? A turkey baster.";)


"what's long and hard and full of seamen?"
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 861 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 557 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 252 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM 645 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 609 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 596 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 569 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 635 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 545 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 539 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 534 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 589 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 521 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 559 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 525 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 659 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 263 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 286 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 262 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 553 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 580 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 689 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 318 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 340 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 550 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 621 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 596 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 614 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 557 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 601 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 759 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 564 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 676 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 567 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 537 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 579 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 481 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 595 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 482 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 351 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 242 Views

Reply to Message