Active Users:696 Time:19/03/2026 06:14:13 PM
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) imlad Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
"Submarines: 150 men go down, 75 couples come up."

But when we learned that the Navy (this was back in '04) was considering commissioning subs for women only crews, I amended it to

"Submarines: 150 women go down, and go down again, and again, and again."

My lesbian friends loved that one (these were the girls that told me the joke "What do lesbians bring with them on the second date? A turkey baster.";)


"what's long and hard and full of seamen?"
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 895 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 589 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 266 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM 677 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 637 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 626 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 609 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 668 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 583 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 581 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 576 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 619 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 549 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 594 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 566 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 693 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 275 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 304 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 275 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 586 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 611 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 715 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 334 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 354 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 587 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 660 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 629 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 644 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 586 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 630 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 794 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 601 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 704 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 595 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 588 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 612 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 516 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 629 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 524 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 363 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 257 Views

Reply to Message