Active Users:434 Time:19/06/2025 03:27:08 PM
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) imlad Send a noteboard - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
"Submarines: 150 men go down, 75 couples come up."

But when we learned that the Navy (this was back in '04) was considering commissioning subs for women only crews, I amended it to

"Submarines: 150 women go down, and go down again, and again, and again."

My lesbian friends loved that one (these were the girls that told me the joke "What do lesbians bring with them on the second date? A turkey baster.";)


"what's long and hard and full of seamen?"
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters) - 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM 815 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke.... - 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM 516 Views
Ahahahahaha! *NM* - 28/09/2009 10:02:01 PM 235 Views
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference) - 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM 603 Views
seems like a strange choice to me - 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM 565 Views
if you can't keep it zipped - 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM 553 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already. - 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM 527 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement. - 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM 591 Views
WHOA! - 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM 501 Views
Dude I know!! - 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM 493 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show". - 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM 492 Views
XD Or even better!!! - 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM 539 Views
ROFL! - 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM 476 Views
Really the possibilities are endless. - 29/09/2009 01:48:34 AM 507 Views
Indeed. - 29/09/2009 02:46:31 AM 481 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM 614 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM 243 Views
only the ones who don't charge for their services? *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:36:03 AM 265 Views
Haha!! Touche! I concede that point. *NM* - 29/09/2009 11:59:33 PM 228 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend... - 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM 511 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue. - 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM 537 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking? - 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM 623 Views
Well said *NM* - 29/09/2009 03:59:13 PM 301 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM 322 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument” - 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM 510 Views
keep in zipped is such a bad argument - 29/09/2009 02:51:45 PM 574 Views
A submariner's perspective - 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM 559 Views
Interesting. - 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM 573 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM 517 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 03:57:10 PM 560 Views
Re: a rack is just the name for a bed - 29/09/2009 04:46:12 PM 707 Views
It is amazing what you can get used to - 29/09/2009 06:03:05 PM 514 Views
Re: Interesting. - 29/09/2009 04:42:54 PM 611 Views
See, that's a good reason. - 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM 527 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument - 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM 481 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities - 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM 539 Views
You have to cut with the grain. - 30/09/2009 03:05:29 PM 438 Views
Re: before you knock the return to high school argument - 30/09/2009 01:10:35 AM 548 Views
It is a strange mix - 30/09/2009 02:56:21 PM 423 Views
Thank you for talking some sense. *NM* - 29/09/2009 06:46:33 PM 332 Views
Thank you for taking the time to answer. Well done. *NM* - 30/09/2009 12:07:49 AM 225 Views

Reply to Message