Active Users:3452 Time:14/09/2026 08:22:32 AM
Is that true? Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM
as a personal example, i got a tax refund last year. therefore, i qualify for the 46-47% who "paid no income tax".


I have never heard/didn't realize that people who paid more than their federal income tax liability and therefore received a refund are included in the oft-repeated stat about "half the country" (or 47%, etc.) not paying income tax. I assumed that was referring to people who after EIC/deduction/etc. had zero or negative tax liability, therefore getting back all they paid or more than they paid, which isn't the same...at all.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1210 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 758 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 883 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 755 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 758 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 807 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 863 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 777 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 320 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 778 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 737 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 691 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 665 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 671 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 689 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 732 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 730 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 696 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 712 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 665 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 678 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 681 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 304 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 854 Views

Reply to Message