Active Users:1986 Time:02/05/2026 05:15:39 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%? Legolas Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM
With "correct number" defined as people who pay zero or negative federal income tax when you include payroll taxes, that is - I was under the impression everyone with an income paid payroll taxes. But I guess if your income tax itself is sufficiently "negative", it may be more than the payroll taxes you pay...
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? moondog - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1152 Views
Wrong Dark Knight - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 713 Views
Additional categories Jragghen - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 836 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend Dark Knight - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 703 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend Jragghen - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 704 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments Dark Knight - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 759 Views
ok moondog - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 809 Views
Is that true? Sareitha Sedai - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 731 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* Dark Knight - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 298 Views
No Roland00 - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 725 Views
Looking at that chart you linked, I have some questions. Nate - 18/09/2012 07:05:24 PM 684 Views
Payroll taxes are for Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid Dark Knight - 18/09/2012 07:11:57 PM 666 Views
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax. Tom - 18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM 653 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%? Legolas - 18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM 692 Views
That is correct - some folks have such negative income taxes, it offsets payroll as well. Anonymous2000 - 19/09/2012 05:28:07 AM 702 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007) Jragghen - 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM 933 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? nossy - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 683 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me snoopcester - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 643 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. nossy - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 614 Views
You gave that away with your first post snoopcester - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 624 Views
No way! nossy - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 637 Views
Yuh huh! snoopcester - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 680 Views
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009. Joel - 18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM 600 Views
As an outside observer ... Nate - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 678 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... Isaac - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 649 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... moondog - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 664 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff Isaac - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 620 Views
Eh, those already exist, if people bothered to look Jragghen - 19/09/2012 08:08:35 AM 872 Views
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect Isaac - 19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM 610 Views
It's a conflict of interest. Aeryn - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 634 Views
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class. Joel - 18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM 672 Views
I think you got it wrong: Narg - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 634 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* Anonymous2000 - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 277 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% Anonymous2000 - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 801 Views
Washington Post similar to Anonymous', but shows how many people get each credit. Joel - 19/09/2012 06:45:08 PM 735 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes