Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.
Recent, maybe?
And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"?
- 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM
1175 Views
Wrong
- 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM
729 Views
Additional categories
- 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM
852 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend
- 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM
725 Views
Is that true?
- 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM
747 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM*
- 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
306 Views
) *NM*
- 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM
306 Views
Looking at that chart you linked, I have some questions.
- 18/09/2012 07:05:24 PM
706 Views
I think the reasoning is that since they go to entitlement programs, it's not entirely a tax.
- 18/09/2012 10:55:12 PM
675 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%?
- 18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM
713 Views
That is correct - some folks have such negative income taxes, it offsets payroll as well.
- 19/09/2012 05:28:07 AM
718 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007)
- 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM
954 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's?
- 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM
704 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me
- 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM
662 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me.
- 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
637 Views
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009.
- 18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM
615 Views
As an outside observer ...
- 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM
699 Views
Re: As an outside observer ...
- 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM
667 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though....
- 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM
685 Views
Eh, those already exist, if people bothered to look
- 19/09/2012 08:08:35 AM
888 Views
Those are toothless examples, no bite to them and old news so no shock value aspect
- 19/09/2012 08:44:01 AM
625 Views
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class.
- 18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM
694 Views
I think you got it wrong:
- 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM
652 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM*
- 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM
283 Views
Washington Post similar to Anonymous', but shows how many people get each credit.
- 19/09/2012 06:45:08 PM
759 Views