Active Users:2025 Time:02/05/2026 10:26:23 AM
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. nossy Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM
Reason actions (those from within the last ten years) are a pretty good indicator of who someone really is, and if someone is going to be talking about tax when in a position to influence tax policy then it is quite relevant, in my opinion, to know how they actually act.


Recent, maybe?

And you think that us seeing something that hasn't (presumably) been audited as fishy by the IRS will make a difference? I think people only want to see it for the same reasons as those who want to see the Kate boobies. Or the Obama birth certificate.
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1153 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 714 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 837 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 706 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 705 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 759 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 810 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 732 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 298 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 726 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 687 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 644 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 617 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 625 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 637 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 681 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 680 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 650 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 665 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 620 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 636 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 636 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 277 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 802 Views

Reply to Message