Active Users:374 Time:01/05/2025 08:05:35 PM
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM
Now tax credits Republicans created/expanded as "tax relief" (remember that term?) for the abused middle class makes the same people "freeloaders." The child tax credit in particular grew dramatically under Bush, and I believe it had already risen under Clinton. The first time home buyer credit is a more recent but similar example. Anyway, that is your explanation: Many middle class families receive so many tax credits they have a net federal income tax benefit, and the GOP that demanded those things as an indispensable help to for the overtaxed middle class now condemns them as proof of freeloading.

People who do not know history are pathetically easy to snow.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 18/09/2012 at 11:23:39 PM
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1041 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 605 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 713 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 584 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 575 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 646 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 675 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 622 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 241 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 595 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 555 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 531 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 505 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 496 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 522 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 553 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 577 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 531 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 552 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 501 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 507 Views
The stat is valid, because of tax credits the GOP created/expanded for the overtaxed middle class. - 18/09/2012 11:22:13 PM 560 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 518 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 229 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 671 Views

Reply to Message