Active Users:2585 Time:18/06/2026 02:42:09 PM
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009. Joel Send a noteboard - 18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM
In case you were unaware, that is one of the more popular explanations for why he will not release them, even though he had n0 problem doing so in 2008: Because in 2009 the US finally got Switzerland to let the IRS know the owners and contents of Swiss bank accounts, and the revelations were so devastating they offered multi-decade tax dodgers an amnesty for delinquent taxes.

Speaking of Romneys taxes, even the single year he HAS released (2010) is incomplete, because it lacks a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR.) I mention this not (primarily) to dog on Romney, but because you should be aware of that form if you are not yet. It is a form the IRS requires all Americans to file for any foreign bank accounts with a balance >$50,000. I found out about it a while back when I read an article about a woman who lived in Sweden for years, blissfully unaware of the FBAR requirement, but sought to rectify the problem when she learned of it. After she notified the IRS they notified HER that she owed them millions of dollars in penalties and interest, equal to her annual income for the next 20 years.

So, um, y'know, be aware if you were not already. And lemme know if you see a 2010 Romney FBAR for his Swiss and Cayman accounts. ;)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1176 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 730 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 852 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 725 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 726 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 777 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 830 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 748 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 306 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 741 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 704 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 662 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 637 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 642 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 652 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 700 Views
I am a BIT curious whether he took the IRS amnesty for tax dodging in 2009. - 18/09/2012 11:32:31 PM 616 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 700 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 668 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 685 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 637 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 651 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 652 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 283 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 821 Views

Reply to Message