Active Users:3563 Time:14/09/2026 07:39:18 AM
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007) Jragghen Send a noteboard - 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM
Link is the clickable one at the bottom.

Includes Federal Income (and offsets), payroll, and excise taxes. As you can see, due to the progressive nature of federal income taxes, up until the top quintile (the bars mark, if I'm not mistaken, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, next 10%, next 5%, top 5% - including the top 400, and the top 400 separate), where it plateaus and starts to drop again, because such an insignificant portion of their wealth comes from income as opposed to other means (capital gains, etc).

State and local taxes are usually regressive (numbers from 2007 as well):

http://www.policyshop.net/storage/Demos-Stateandlocaltaxrates.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1333977357388

which only tends to exacerbate the problem.

Noteworthy exclusions from these lists: corporate taxes (which depends on whether you consider them to be property of the top tenth of a percent or so, or separate entities), and one-time taxes (estate tax in particular) which are often cited as well, but are rather disingenuous for an annual graph.


So basically, the poor benefit somewhat from the progressive federal tax, as they're intended to, as they have practically no money to spend on necessities. Tax rate increases as your income increases, until you reach a certain threshold at about 6 figures, where (in large part due to the tax cuts on the upper end since Eisenhower, coupled with low long-term capital gains taxes) the effective tax rate starts dropping to where the rich not only have more money to start with, but they're paying less on it than those in lower tiers.
Link
Reply to message
what does it mean to "pay no federal income tax"? - 18/09/2012 06:30:28 PM 1210 Views
Wrong - 18/09/2012 06:37:07 PM 757 Views
Additional categories - 18/09/2012 06:51:46 PM 882 Views
SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 06:59:28 PM 755 Views
Re: SS income is very much taxed, my friend - 18/09/2012 07:22:35 PM 756 Views
The wealthy get their income from investments - 18/09/2012 07:33:55 PM 807 Views
ok - 19/09/2012 05:46:49 AM 863 Views
Is that true? - 18/09/2012 06:54:33 PM 776 Views
No, it's not. See my post (you should really have read it first ) *NM* - 18/09/2012 07:00:07 PM 320 Views
No - 18/09/2012 06:56:43 PM 778 Views
Does that mean the correct number is that 27.6%? - 18/09/2012 07:17:46 PM 743 Views
If it helps, here's a graph of effective federal tax rate by quintile, all taxes (data from 2007) - 19/09/2012 08:30:37 AM 992 Views
While we're talking about taxes, am I the only one who doesn't give a rat's ass about Romney's? - 18/09/2012 10:37:12 PM 737 Views
That sort of thing does matter to me - 18/09/2012 10:48:30 PM 690 Views
Ah, yeah, not so much for me. - 18/09/2012 11:16:56 PM 665 Views
You gave that away with your first post - 18/09/2012 11:49:28 PM 671 Views
No way! - 19/09/2012 01:41:04 PM 688 Views
Yuh huh! - 19/09/2012 08:56:01 PM 731 Views
As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 01:28:13 AM 730 Views
Re: As an outside observer ... - 19/09/2012 04:45:11 AM 696 Views
the question of legality has already been covered by the offshore accounts though.... - 19/09/2012 05:44:28 AM 712 Views
Different situation then the Birther stuff - 19/09/2012 07:02:09 AM 664 Views
It's a conflict of interest. - 21/09/2012 09:52:58 PM 678 Views
I think you got it wrong: - 19/09/2012 01:52:30 AM 681 Views
+1 - you are correct, moondog screwed the pooch with this post. *NM* - 19/09/2012 05:18:19 AM 304 Views
Easier to read/understand - WSJ data on the 47% - 19/09/2012 05:25:01 AM 854 Views

Reply to Message