Active Users:599 Time:30/03/2026 10:38:01 AM
Which poll at your link shows anything but Obama leading every swing state but NC? Joel Send a noteboard - 04/10/2012 05:41:31 PM
This week, Politico released its latest Battleground poll of the presidential race. Despite coming from the left-wing news site, the poll is one of my favorites. Its put together by respected pollsters from both parties, makes available its full cross-tabs and uses a very modest and reasonable turnout model for its sample. Including leaners, the sample in the poll is D+2. Nationally, Obama leads by 2-3 points, but, in the critical swing states, Romney now has the edge.

Each candidate leads in states considered “safe” for their party. In safe GOP states, Romney leads by 8. In safe Democrat states, Obama leads by a massive 22 points. But, in the more numerous and more important “toss up” states, Romney leads by 4, hitting the critical 50% threshold.

The only Battleground polls I see are from before the debate and show what all other pre-debate polls showed: Obama with a slim national lead but a larger one in every swing state but FL, and a commanding one in OH, WI and NH. That put him at 269, a single electoral vote shy of victory, so Romney would have to run the table just to force the election into the House—and could not even do that if Obama won Omahas single EV again (which he will not.)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Romney CRUSHES Obama in First Debate - Leads Swing States by 4% - 04/10/2012 05:32:32 AM 1179 Views
So, is that from a "corrected", "non-skewed" poll? - 04/10/2012 05:51:58 AM 711 Views
Nope, I checked Betfair, the odds on Romney continue to drift - 04/10/2012 10:02:16 AM 783 Views
Wow, you suck at Googling! - 04/10/2012 01:14:22 PM 897 Views
Which poll at your link shows anything but Obama leading every swing state but NC? - 04/10/2012 05:41:31 PM 799 Views
No, you just apparently suck at math - 04/10/2012 07:17:20 PM 653 Views
I know you are sad, but your Messiah may still win.....you never know! - 04/10/2012 07:23:16 PM 721 Views
I'm more of a syndicalist, sorry - 04/10/2012 08:43:48 PM 745 Views
Ooh, would you mind talking more about syndicalism? - 04/10/2012 11:28:40 PM 656 Views
It really should be mandatory for everyone to read factcheck.org after every debate. *NM* - 04/10/2012 09:38:24 AM 402 Views
Seriously. The number of times I squinted and thought, "Wait, that doesn't sound quite right" - 04/10/2012 02:01:12 PM 782 Views
Romney addressed that head-on - 04/10/2012 02:13:44 PM 684 Views
Yeah, that "20 million" comment raised my eyebrows. - 04/10/2012 04:15:49 PM 1051 Views
Why are you not counting the elderly? - 04/10/2012 07:33:28 PM 959 Views
Obama - Lost and Bewildered without Teleprompter.....funny stuff! - 04/10/2012 01:10:40 PM 718 Views
A2000, your message should read: - 04/10/2012 03:42:18 PM 743 Views
I consider the margin of error implied. - 04/10/2012 05:49:50 PM 630 Views
Unfortunately statistics does not support that. - 04/10/2012 06:11:56 PM 750 Views
Of course they do; the law of averages supports that. - 04/10/2012 06:46:27 PM 782 Views
Poll numbers aren't random so even if the law of averages could be applied to a small data set... - 04/10/2012 07:05:49 PM 661 Views
that is why you can't base things on just one poll - 05/10/2012 01:27:18 AM 842 Views
You are making the same mistake Joel is making. You should read our discussion. *NM* - 05/10/2012 01:50:01 AM 474 Views
there is a difference between statistical errors and model or method errors - 05/10/2012 03:28:38 AM 727 Views
There is a difference between the law of averages and the law of large numbers. - 05/10/2012 04:45:00 AM 941 Views
can wait for Ryan vs Bozo the VP - 04/10/2012 06:07:30 PM 607 Views
+1 - that debate is going to be comical! - 04/10/2012 07:24:26 PM 712 Views
I would end up with alchohol posioning *NM* - 04/10/2012 10:16:51 PM 436 Views
If Biden performs as expected... - 04/10/2012 07:46:16 PM 749 Views
your take on obama's foreign policy debate performance does not seem like reality - 04/10/2012 08:00:51 PM 679 Views
I never would have thought Romney could lay such a beatdown on Obama as I saw last night. - 04/10/2012 08:55:46 PM 764 Views
we saw the anti-romney last night. i doubt obama is going to be so flat-footed against him next time - 04/10/2012 10:35:21 PM 689 Views
Hilarious. - 04/10/2012 11:20:32 PM 659 Views
Re: Hilarious. - 05/10/2012 12:27:33 AM 649 Views
Why can it not be both? - 05/10/2012 12:58:59 PM 791 Views
who would you consider our number one geopolitical foe? - 04/10/2012 10:12:53 PM 781 Views
China is far more dangerous. *NM* - 05/10/2012 07:23:06 AM 337 Views
Whoa, was not expecting that point of agreement. - 05/10/2012 12:35:35 PM 794 Views
I'm not frightened of them, but they're hardly an ally. *NM* - 05/10/2012 03:55:45 PM 431 Views
I am not frightened, but am concerned. - 06/10/2012 01:27:40 PM 778 Views
they may be more dangerous but that doesn't that doesn't automatically make them first - 05/10/2012 01:09:30 PM 770 Views
That's fair enough. *NM* - 05/10/2012 03:54:56 PM 377 Views
WOW - Even the liberal CNN Poll confirms Romney's crushing victory. - 04/10/2012 07:27:28 PM 799 Views
I could have crushed either of them in that debate - 04/10/2012 09:26:07 PM 781 Views
I watched it now. A few thoughts (albeit rather late): - 05/10/2012 09:46:02 PM 839 Views
You are correct on all points. - 07/10/2012 03:12:51 AM 943 Views
"There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe." - 07/10/2012 02:03:49 PM 1239 Views
you are missing a key point - 07/10/2012 04:34:17 PM 735 Views
Am I missing that point? I thought I said clearly enough that I thought Romney was better. *NM* - 07/10/2012 08:47:42 PM 440 Views
maybe, seemed that way to me - 08/10/2012 03:18:18 PM 717 Views

Reply to Message