Active Users:345 Time:12/07/2025 07:26:06 PM
Still not a 3:1 ratio. Joel Send a noteboard - 06/10/2012 06:09:00 PM
One of my trials came out 69% heads. What I am saying is that this is equivalent to Obama or Romney winning 69 polls out of 100. It is not indicative that the population is bias one way or the other. It still could be random.

Our scenario here, is that we have one trial of 136 polls. Which would be equivalent to 136 coin tosses. You saw a 60% and I saw a 69% so we know that even in a random situation the coin can appear to be biased in a single trial.

The only way to alleviate this problem is by having significantly more coin flips in the trial. As you demonstrated when you added all 500 coin flips together.

It is close, I will give you that, but not quite. And that is the closest either of us got in 10 trials (unless you did the full 10, in which case it is 15.) The same outcome in 69/100 flips once (and 60/100 twice) is thus theoretically possible but very unlikely in 10 (or 15) trials. None our trials showed the same outcome 75/100 times.

Obama leading 75% of 136 polls thus strongly indicates he has (or had) a real advantage. There is a slim possibility the sample is too small to remove all anomalies, but there will always be SOME possibility of that. The probability of it based on the current sample is, however, already quite small (if impossible to know precisely.)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 06/10/2012 at 06:09:18 PM
Reply to message
Romney CRUSHES Obama in First Debate - Leads Swing States by 4% - 04/10/2012 05:32:32 AM 1120 Views
So, is that from a "corrected", "non-skewed" poll? - 04/10/2012 05:51:58 AM 631 Views
Nope, I checked Betfair, the odds on Romney continue to drift - 04/10/2012 10:02:16 AM 718 Views
Wow, you suck at Googling! - 04/10/2012 01:14:22 PM 829 Views
No, you just apparently suck at math - 04/10/2012 07:17:20 PM 593 Views
I know you are sad, but your Messiah may still win.....you never know! - 04/10/2012 07:23:16 PM 660 Views
I'm more of a syndicalist, sorry - 04/10/2012 08:43:48 PM 692 Views
Ooh, would you mind talking more about syndicalism? - 04/10/2012 11:28:40 PM 598 Views
It really should be mandatory for everyone to read factcheck.org after every debate. *NM* - 04/10/2012 09:38:24 AM 369 Views
Seriously. The number of times I squinted and thought, "Wait, that doesn't sound quite right" - 04/10/2012 02:01:12 PM 721 Views
Romney addressed that head-on - 04/10/2012 02:13:44 PM 615 Views
Yeah, that "20 million" comment raised my eyebrows. - 04/10/2012 04:15:49 PM 976 Views
Why are you not counting the elderly? - 04/10/2012 07:33:28 PM 866 Views
Obama - Lost and Bewildered without Teleprompter.....funny stuff! - 04/10/2012 01:10:40 PM 646 Views
A2000, your message should read: - 04/10/2012 03:42:18 PM 669 Views
I consider the margin of error implied. - 04/10/2012 05:49:50 PM 573 Views
Unfortunately statistics does not support that. - 04/10/2012 06:11:56 PM 687 Views
Of course they do; the law of averages supports that. - 04/10/2012 06:46:27 PM 718 Views
Poll numbers aren't random so even if the law of averages could be applied to a small data set... - 04/10/2012 07:05:49 PM 597 Views
that is why you can't base things on just one poll - 05/10/2012 01:27:18 AM 774 Views
You are making the same mistake Joel is making. You should read our discussion. *NM* - 05/10/2012 01:50:01 AM 449 Views
there is a difference between statistical errors and model or method errors - 05/10/2012 03:28:38 AM 658 Views
There is a difference between the law of averages and the law of large numbers. - 05/10/2012 04:45:00 AM 854 Views
can wait for Ryan vs Bozo the VP - 04/10/2012 06:07:30 PM 543 Views
+1 - that debate is going to be comical! - 04/10/2012 07:24:26 PM 658 Views
I would end up with alchohol posioning *NM* - 04/10/2012 10:16:51 PM 400 Views
If Biden performs as expected... - 04/10/2012 07:46:16 PM 691 Views
your take on obama's foreign policy debate performance does not seem like reality - 04/10/2012 08:00:51 PM 630 Views
I never would have thought Romney could lay such a beatdown on Obama as I saw last night. - 04/10/2012 08:55:46 PM 702 Views
we saw the anti-romney last night. i doubt obama is going to be so flat-footed against him next time - 04/10/2012 10:35:21 PM 628 Views
Hilarious. - 04/10/2012 11:20:32 PM 584 Views
Re: Hilarious. - 05/10/2012 12:27:33 AM 592 Views
Why can it not be both? - 05/10/2012 12:58:59 PM 732 Views
who would you consider our number one geopolitical foe? - 04/10/2012 10:12:53 PM 709 Views
China is far more dangerous. *NM* - 05/10/2012 07:23:06 AM 305 Views
Whoa, was not expecting that point of agreement. - 05/10/2012 12:35:35 PM 738 Views
I'm not frightened of them, but they're hardly an ally. *NM* - 05/10/2012 03:55:45 PM 406 Views
I am not frightened, but am concerned. - 06/10/2012 01:27:40 PM 711 Views
they may be more dangerous but that doesn't that doesn't automatically make them first - 05/10/2012 01:09:30 PM 711 Views
That's fair enough. *NM* - 05/10/2012 03:54:56 PM 352 Views
WOW - Even the liberal CNN Poll confirms Romney's crushing victory. - 04/10/2012 07:27:28 PM 738 Views
I could have crushed either of them in that debate - 04/10/2012 09:26:07 PM 720 Views
I watched it now. A few thoughts (albeit rather late): - 05/10/2012 09:46:02 PM 772 Views
You are correct on all points. - 07/10/2012 03:12:51 AM 881 Views
"There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe." - 07/10/2012 02:03:49 PM 1162 Views
you are missing a key point - 07/10/2012 04:34:17 PM 679 Views
Am I missing that point? I thought I said clearly enough that I thought Romney was better. *NM* - 07/10/2012 08:47:42 PM 413 Views
maybe, seemed that way to me - 08/10/2012 03:18:18 PM 656 Views

Reply to Message