How far do those subs range, compared to US subs ? They might be out for tours of no more than six weeks or so, while US subs probably go out for far longer sometimes.
It's probably beyond our ability to google though.
It's probably beyond our ability to google though.
Wikipedia says that the only class of Australian submarines have an endurance of 70 days, which is probably as much info as we'll get. Unless you go nuclear it's hard to get longer than that anyway, due to the need for refueling.
--- signature starts here ---
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!
e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
"Military may lift ban on women in submarines" (Reuters)
- 28/09/2009 08:26:30 PM
934 Views
gives new meaning to the old joke....
- 28/09/2009 09:47:36 PM
624 Views
*NM*
my favorite joke from Navy basic training (mature readers only, poorly veiled sexual reference)
- 28/09/2009 10:06:51 PM
707 Views
As I understand it, there are very good reasons why they don't let women on submarines.
- 28/09/2009 09:50:39 PM
702 Views
frankly i get along better with women who are menstruating with me.
- 28/09/2009 11:26:05 PM
655 Views
seems like a strange choice to me
- 28/09/2009 10:26:24 PM
681 Views
if you can't keep it zipped
- 28/09/2009 11:35:35 PM
659 Views
Correct and yet it happens all too frequently already.
- 29/09/2009 12:43:15 AM
646 Views
In my mind, that's a pretty pathetic arguement.
- 29/09/2009 01:02:31 AM
704 Views
WHOA!
- 29/09/2009 01:14:27 AM
617 Views
Dude I know!!
- 29/09/2009 01:20:27 AM
639 Views
Hehehe, we could "name the show".
- 29/09/2009 01:26:11 AM
608 Views
XD Or even better!!!
- 29/09/2009 01:40:50 AM
658 Views
ROFL!
- 29/09/2009 01:47:07 AM
580 Views
Your comparison to segregation is idiotic. I won't even give such a stupid claim a second thought. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 01:44:46 AM
279 Views
I love how you disregard my entire arguement based on that one factor
- 29/09/2009 01:48:09 AM
724 Views
It is an irresponsible comparison. Even in your response to my comment you can't make it work. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 06:39:48 PM
271 Views
Actually I could see her point. She was thinking along a different line than you thought she was. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 02:57:17 AM
323 Views
It's not idiotic at all.
- 29/09/2009 05:21:49 AM
628 Views
Sweden has women on subs, as do (at least) Norway, Germany, Australia and Canada *NM*
- 29/09/2009 07:38:43 AM
300 Views
Just wondering..
- 29/09/2009 12:42:22 PM
641 Views
well since all of those countries use diesel/electric subs I would no they don't stay out as long
- 29/09/2009 03:10:34 PM
626 Views
There's also the fact that none of those countries have nuclear weapons
- 29/09/2009 03:14:48 PM
640 Views
As for Sweden, that sounds about right
- 29/09/2009 03:12:29 PM
585 Views
Racial prejudice has nothing to do with envy over who is fucking who. It is not a valid comparison. *NM*
- 29/09/2009 06:40:57 PM
297 Views
~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
- 29/09/2009 02:54:03 AM
727 Views
By that same token, should women also be banned from long business trips? *NM*
- 29/09/2009 03:23:22 AM
292 Views
Re: ~Plays devils advocate~ Lets pretend...
- 29/09/2009 03:23:31 AM
622 Views
It might be true in some situations, but it's a weak argument against this issue.
- 29/09/2009 05:15:47 AM
663 Views
subs are really really cramped. Ever heard the phrase hot racking?
- 29/09/2009 03:23:33 PM
763 Views
"The military is instrument of war not social engineering." Excelent point. *NM*
- 30/09/2009 12:34:28 AM
370 Views
oh please will people stop the “it worked with segregation argument”
- 29/09/2009 03:01:48 PM
627 Views
A submariner's perspective
- 29/09/2009 08:30:45 AM
676 Views
That was not Beqi but Grimbear. I was signed in but it still credited the post to her. GRRR! *NM*
- 29/09/2009 08:32:21 AM
389 Views
Interesting.
- 29/09/2009 09:55:11 AM
684 Views
a rack is just the name for a bed
- 29/09/2009 03:30:05 PM
626 Views
See, that's a good reason.
- 29/09/2009 01:29:32 PM
633 Views
before you knock the return to high school argument
- 29/09/2009 10:39:47 PM
625 Views
which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities 
- 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM
656 Views
- 30/09/2009 12:08:46 AM
656 Views
Re: which i think is just silly in the terms of greater age-related legalities
- 30/09/2009 01:12:05 AM
615 Views
- 30/09/2009 01:12:05 AM
615 Views