yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
moondog Send a noteboard - 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
from the sound of it, he opposed the bill because it would have not given protections for legally allowed abortions under the law. i'm not sure that is an inconsistent position for obama, and certainly does not equate to the same type of shock as mourdock's rape pregnancy comment. it's not like obama is forcing people to get abortions or telling them they should be thankful god intended for them to get pregnant after they were raped after all....
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
God Distances Self From Christian Right
- 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM
1329 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM
392 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization."
- 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM
640 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is....
- 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM
817 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin?
- 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM
680 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but...
- 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM
655 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. 
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
734 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
734 Views
Your lack of scientific understanding is everything in this instance.
- 26/10/2012 10:44:05 PM
663 Views
Because whether God intends rape is aaaall about science, right?
- 26/10/2012 11:08:16 PM
592 Views
You're getting rather emphatic.
- 26/10/2012 11:27:07 PM
647 Views
Broad fundamental change to US law by controlling all three branches of government provokes that.
- 27/10/2012 12:44:59 AM
660 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this.
- 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM
700 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect
- 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM
734 Views
So we legalize an illegal act because some are willing to harm themselves to do it? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 10:02:37 PM
359 Views
no, we legalize the act so that it can be performed safely without killing both mother *and* child *NM*
- 26/10/2012 11:08:52 PM
372 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no.
- 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM
656 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals
- 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM
686 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive.
- 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM
697 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all...
- 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM
720 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal
- 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM
624 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are.
- 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM
781 Views
This isn't necessarily true, though it is often due to other factors.
- 27/10/2012 02:48:00 PM
681 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient."
- 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM
610 Views
Telling a woman whose life was in danger not to save it with abortion condemned her to die
- 26/10/2012 10:48:53 PM
622 Views
There is no proof that you would accept that a fetus is a child.
- 26/10/2012 11:31:50 PM
624 Views
Fantastic question.
- 26/10/2012 11:43:51 PM
652 Views
No, I would err on the side of caution; have often said as much in just those words.
- 27/10/2012 01:18:19 AM
638 Views
Sure there is; show me a fetus acting indepedently and consciously.
- 27/10/2012 01:15:00 AM
656 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism
- 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM
732 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative
- 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM
697 Views
yeah, but what do women know about women's issues? this is man talk time!
- 26/10/2012 05:01:58 PM
654 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment.
- 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM
621 Views
Or it could mean....
- 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM
673 Views
Having addressed this in response to Legolas in moondogs thread on Mourdock, I will just link that.
- 27/10/2012 01:43:48 AM
681 Views
I agree
- 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM
719 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend.
- 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM
672 Views
There is a logically consistent way; you did not ask for it, so I will be brief.
- 27/10/2012 02:53:09 AM
656 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause.
- 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM
677 Views
God intends everything.
- 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM
751 Views
"Intends" is a big word.
- 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM
671 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM*
- 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM
349 Views
that's probably because it's more relevant to most people's lives *NM*
- 26/10/2012 06:06:10 PM
367 Views
This entire scandal really speaks to the Calvinist heresy in particular.
- 26/10/2012 07:10:38 PM
646 Views
I was trying REALLY hard to avoid putting it in precisely those terms. 
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
694 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
694 Views
Well, but really, the fundamental crux of the issue is precisely that.
- 27/10/2012 01:03:26 AM
654 Views
True, but disputing founding articles of faith benefits from tact.
- 27/10/2012 02:02:48 AM
603 Views
Come on, Tom.
- 27/10/2012 03:29:39 AM
630 Views
I believe HE grasps the difference between predestination and determinism well.
- 27/10/2012 09:33:14 PM
694 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM*
- 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM
360 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads.
- 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM
639 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the
- 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM
651 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent?
- 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM
641 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM
364 Views
[citation needed]
- 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM
608 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM
343 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
- 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
652 Views
The BAIPA became federal law 2 years before Obamas Senate win; he says he would have voted for it.
- 27/10/2012 02:33:26 AM
635 Views
Once he started taking fire for it he said he would have voted for it? Well that clears that up.
- 27/10/2012 07:09:21 AM
823 Views
He "took fire" for a federal law passed before he was in Congress?
- 27/10/2012 04:08:25 PM
710 Views
amazing
- 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
757 Views
Women are certainly encouraged to weigh in, but everyone is entitled to thoughts on the matter
- 28/10/2012 02:22:55 PM
644 Views