Here is the 2001 proposed legislation opposed by Obama:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet92/summary/920SB1095.html
2002 proposed legislation opposed by Obama:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet92/sbgroups/sb/920SB1093LV.html
2003 proposed legislation opposed by Obama:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=09300SB1082&GA=93&SessionId=3&DocTypeId=SB&LegID=3910&DocNum=1082&GAID=3&Session=
Note the amended language (you can click a link on the page to see it) puts in the same langauge placed in the bill passed by the US congres to ensure that this doesn't give any human rights to an unborn fetus. Obama still opposed it. His comments for opposing the 2003 legislation are not on the record, but his reasons for opposing the 2001 and 2002 legislation regarded fears about limiting abortion.
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet92/summary/920SB1095.html
2002 proposed legislation opposed by Obama:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet92/sbgroups/sb/920SB1093LV.html
2003 proposed legislation opposed by Obama:
http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=09300SB1082&GA=93&SessionId=3&DocTypeId=SB&LegID=3910&DocNum=1082&GAID=3&Session=
Note the amended language (you can click a link on the page to see it) puts in the same langauge placed in the bill passed by the US congres to ensure that this doesn't give any human rights to an unborn fetus. Obama still opposed it. His comments for opposing the 2003 legislation are not on the record, but his reasons for opposing the 2001 and 2002 legislation regarded fears about limiting abortion.
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
This message last edited by Narg on 27/10/2012 at 12:51:27 AM
God Distances Self From Christian Right
- 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM
1566 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM
498 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization."
- 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM
849 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is....
- 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM
1038 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin?
- 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM
880 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but...
- 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM
879 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. 
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
958 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM
958 Views
Your lack of scientific understanding is everything in this instance.
- 26/10/2012 10:44:05 PM
893 Views
Because whether God intends rape is aaaall about science, right?
- 26/10/2012 11:08:16 PM
787 Views
You're getting rather emphatic.
- 26/10/2012 11:27:07 PM
852 Views
Broad fundamental change to US law by controlling all three branches of government provokes that.
- 27/10/2012 12:44:59 AM
886 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this.
- 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM
905 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect
- 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM
945 Views
So we legalize an illegal act because some are willing to harm themselves to do it? *NM*
- 26/10/2012 10:02:37 PM
481 Views
no, we legalize the act so that it can be performed safely without killing both mother *and* child *NM*
- 26/10/2012 11:08:52 PM
470 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no.
- 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM
848 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals
- 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM
874 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive.
- 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM
931 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all...
- 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM
927 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal
- 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM
865 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are.
- 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM
983 Views
This isn't necessarily true, though it is often due to other factors.
- 27/10/2012 02:48:00 PM
882 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient."
- 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM
831 Views
Telling a woman whose life was in danger not to save it with abortion condemned her to die
- 26/10/2012 10:48:53 PM
823 Views
There is no proof that you would accept that a fetus is a child.
- 26/10/2012 11:31:50 PM
818 Views
Fantastic question.
- 26/10/2012 11:43:51 PM
847 Views
No, I would err on the side of caution; have often said as much in just those words.
- 27/10/2012 01:18:19 AM
848 Views
Sure there is; show me a fetus acting indepedently and consciously.
- 27/10/2012 01:15:00 AM
911 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism
- 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM
962 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative
- 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM
891 Views
yeah, but what do women know about women's issues? this is man talk time!
- 26/10/2012 05:01:58 PM
865 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment.
- 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM
833 Views
Or it could mean....
- 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM
880 Views
Having addressed this in response to Legolas in moondogs thread on Mourdock, I will just link that.
- 27/10/2012 01:43:48 AM
885 Views
I agree
- 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM
949 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend.
- 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM
886 Views
There is a logically consistent way; you did not ask for it, so I will be brief.
- 27/10/2012 02:53:09 AM
905 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause.
- 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM
891 Views
God intends everything.
- 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM
965 Views
"Intends" is a big word.
- 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM
873 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM*
- 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM
460 Views
that's probably because it's more relevant to most people's lives *NM*
- 26/10/2012 06:06:10 PM
462 Views
This entire scandal really speaks to the Calvinist heresy in particular.
- 26/10/2012 07:10:38 PM
850 Views
I was trying REALLY hard to avoid putting it in precisely those terms. 
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
888 Views
- 26/10/2012 10:12:17 PM
888 Views
Well, but really, the fundamental crux of the issue is precisely that.
- 27/10/2012 01:03:26 AM
853 Views
True, but disputing founding articles of faith benefits from tact.
- 27/10/2012 02:02:48 AM
814 Views
Come on, Tom.
- 27/10/2012 03:29:39 AM
859 Views
I believe HE grasps the difference between predestination and determinism well.
- 27/10/2012 09:33:14 PM
908 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM*
- 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM
451 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads.
- 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM
826 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the
- 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM
854 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent?
- 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM
830 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM
462 Views
[citation needed]
- 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM
809 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM*
- 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM
486 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose
- 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM
885 Views
Links:
- 27/10/2012 12:51:12 AM
873 Views
The BAIPA became federal law 2 years before Obamas Senate win; he says he would have voted for it.
- 27/10/2012 02:33:26 AM
827 Views
Once he started taking fire for it he said he would have voted for it? Well that clears that up.
- 27/10/2012 07:09:21 AM
1041 Views
He "took fire" for a federal law passed before he was in Congress?
- 27/10/2012 04:08:25 PM
944 Views
amazing
- 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
986 Views
Women are certainly encouraged to weigh in, but everyone is entitled to thoughts on the matter
- 28/10/2012 02:22:55 PM
855 Views