Active Users:357 Time:03/05/2024 06:14:28 AM
amazing imlad Send a noteboard - 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
Not to say there isn't some interesting discussion on this thread, but I do find it amazing that this thread seems to be mostly men discussing decisions about a woman's body.

That's what started this whole damned mess, ESPECIALLY since all of those texts were not only written by men, but by men with no concept of science or biology, and the fact that they were men who typically did not think of women as being anywhere near their equals.

Even if divinely inspired, God's message still has to flow through the mind and body of those men before it reaches the paper leaving it open to corruption by the mind of the vessel, and that alone makes anything they wrote dealing with women suspect in my mind.

I do credit you guys on your knowledge of the texts (and all that Greek!), but my personal belief is that with the "written word of God" shit gets lost or changed in translation, and I'm not talking human languages; I'm talking about how God's message is translated from inspiration to text on the page.

So what a bunch of men 2000 years ago claim some specifically MALE deity says about women and birth and all that is meaningless in a society that should have evolved out of the Dark Ages created by those same patriarch's disdain of rational thought and humanism, which led to said Dark Ages.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
God Distances Self From Christian Right - 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM 1170 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM 336 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization." - 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM 513 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is.... - 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM 681 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin? - 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM 537 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but... - 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM 554 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. - 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM 596 Views
That's a dangerous stance to take as a Christian - 27/10/2012 01:11:14 AM 529 Views
I agree it is good reading; that does not make it binding. - 27/10/2012 01:37:20 AM 533 Views
Jesus that Greek sounds weird to my ears. - 27/10/2012 03:43:40 AM 629 Views
It's really just simplified Attic. - 27/10/2012 06:11:48 AM 520 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this. - 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM 593 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect - 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM 602 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no. - 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM 515 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals - 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM 542 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive. - 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM 565 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all... - 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM 583 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal - 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM 484 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are. - 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM 637 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient." - 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM 483 Views
You're stuck. - 27/10/2012 07:07:36 AM 598 Views
not entirely - 27/10/2012 03:23:07 PM 596 Views
Give me facts, not supposition. - 27/10/2012 04:10:57 PM 553 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism - 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM 580 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative - 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM 563 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment. - 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM 491 Views
Or it could mean.... - 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM 546 Views
Re: Or it could mean.... - 27/10/2012 12:14:31 AM 525 Views
I agree - 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM 576 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend. - 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM 542 Views
Yes - 27/10/2012 02:20:46 AM 562 Views
I suppose it is splitting hairs. - 27/10/2012 04:32:43 PM 524 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause. - 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM 536 Views
Re: Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause. - 27/10/2012 01:17:04 AM 533 Views
Who said anything about denying them funds? - 27/10/2012 01:54:39 AM 560 Views
God intends everything. - 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM 613 Views
"Intends" is a big word. - 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM 561 Views
Re: "Intends" is a big word. - 29/10/2012 04:56:49 PM 504 Views
I am familiar with the Problem of Evil. - 29/10/2012 06:41:13 PM 516 Views
Absolutely agree. *NM* - 26/10/2012 11:47:04 PM 287 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM* - 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM 294 Views
It is sad partisanship trumps policy for so many. - 26/10/2012 10:52:34 PM 467 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM* - 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM 309 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads. - 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM 507 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the - 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM 515 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent? - 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM 513 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM 311 Views
[citation needed] - 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM 477 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM 295 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose - 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM 516 Views
It is not hard to find, really. - 27/10/2012 02:40:06 AM 475 Views
Links: - 27/10/2012 12:51:12 AM 540 Views
Double post. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:18:42 AM 289 Views
amazing - 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM 615 Views

Reply to Message