Active Users:435 Time:17/06/2025 10:10:30 PM
Poes Law. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM
It was left to the states to decide how electors are chosen. The states have since decided to hold popular elections to choose a slate of electors. Tomorrow Massachusettes may decide to do it by Rock-Paper-Scissors. It is completely up to the individual states.

The currently used method is completely Constitutional. Eliminating the electoral college is not.

Note the :P at the end of my comment. Though if we want to be technical about it, eliminating the electoral college is wholly constitutional via Article V.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 1116 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 653 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 298 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 624 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 588 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 690 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 706 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 612 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 609 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 693 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 608 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 651 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 255 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 604 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 644 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 618 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 513 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 753 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 661 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 369 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 690 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 630 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 653 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 583 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 646 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 569 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 651 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 367 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 620 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 590 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 274 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 657 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 758 Views

Reply to Message