Active Users:656 Time:06/06/2026 04:01:45 AM
Poes Law. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM
It was left to the states to decide how electors are chosen. The states have since decided to hold popular elections to choose a slate of electors. Tomorrow Massachusettes may decide to do it by Rock-Paper-Scissors. It is completely up to the individual states.

The currently used method is completely Constitutional. Eliminating the electoral college is not.

Note the :P at the end of my comment. Though if we want to be technical about it, eliminating the electoral college is wholly constitutional via Article V.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 1251 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 772 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 359 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 750 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 703 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 831 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 818 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 740 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 743 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 807 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 771 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 797 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 313 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 726 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 753 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 745 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 636 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 888 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 786 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 429 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 825 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 762 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 784 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 714 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 775 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 691 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 775 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 427 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 754 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 716 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 334 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 779 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 887 Views

Reply to Message