Active Users:1335 Time:31/07/2026 03:57:15 AM
Poes Law. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM
It was left to the states to decide how electors are chosen. The states have since decided to hold popular elections to choose a slate of electors. Tomorrow Massachusettes may decide to do it by Rock-Paper-Scissors. It is completely up to the individual states.

The currently used method is completely Constitutional. Eliminating the electoral college is not.

Note the :P at the end of my comment. Though if we want to be technical about it, eliminating the electoral college is wholly constitutional via Article V.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 1277 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 799 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 375 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 782 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 735 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 855 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 841 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 765 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 766 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 837 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 800 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 822 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 331 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 752 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 780 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 775 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 656 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 912 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 807 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 451 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 843 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 784 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 807 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 733 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 798 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 717 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 805 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 445 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 777 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 739 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 357 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 806 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 918 Views

Reply to Message