Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
Jragghen Send a noteboard - 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
The government will only screw things up if it gets directly involved. Thankfully, the public agrees with this:
If the plan passes, 24% of voters say the quality of care will get better, and 55% say it will get worse. In August, the numbers were 23% better and 50% worse.
Fifty-four percent (54%) say passage of the plan will make the cost of health care go up while 23% say it will make costs go down. In August, 52% thought the plan would lead to higher costs, and just 17% thought it would achieve the stated goal of lowering costs.
From the recent Rasmussen poll.
If the plan passes, 24% of voters say the quality of care will get better, and 55% say it will get worse. In August, the numbers were 23% better and 50% worse.
Fifty-four percent (54%) say passage of the plan will make the cost of health care go up while 23% say it will make costs go down. In August, 52% thought the plan would lead to higher costs, and just 17% thought it would achieve the stated goal of lowering costs.
From the recent Rasmussen poll.
Right now there's so much fear, uncertainty, and doubt flying around that there's actually a 17 point swing between "Obama's plan" and the pollster describing the points which Obama desires in such a plan. Much how there was a whole lot of the "have you read the bill?!?" in the townhall meetings before there was any bill to be voted upon. So you have to be careful in how opinion polls are phrased in order to get accurate results.
When you take the aggregate of the various polls out there, there are correlations between support for Obama in the general election (ie, people who voted Democratic) and poverty levels (separate from those who voted for Obama) with support for a public option. You can see where the numbers fall in the link below. Regardless, a plurality of Americans are in favor of the public option - neither one crosses 50% (as there's a number of undecideds), but more are in favor than opposed when you consider neutral-asked questions instead of loaded ones.
As-is, there's roughly 56 votes for the public option in the Senate right now, just not in the finance committee. The finalized bill between the House and Senate versions will most likely include some form of a public option, probably something close to what was in Schumer's Amendment.
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
- 856 Views

I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
- 575 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
- 579 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
- 660 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
- 576 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
- 750 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
- 518 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
- 631 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
- 648 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
- 240 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
- 628 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
- 612 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
- 237 Views
That's indisbutable
30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
- 598 Views
It doesn't work at all
30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
- 632 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
- 644 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
- 623 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
- 501 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
- 569 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
- 520 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
- 629 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
- 720 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
- 541 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
- 551 Views
i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
- 597 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
- 658 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
- 639 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
- 648 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
- 613 Views
Interesting...
01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
- 536 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
- 237 Views