Active Users:874 Time:09/09/2026 02:36:33 AM
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased Jragghen Send a noteboard - 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
The government will only screw things up if it gets directly involved. Thankfully, the public agrees with this:

If the plan passes, 24% of voters say the quality of care will get better, and 55% say it will get worse. In August, the numbers were 23% better and 50% worse.

Fifty-four percent (54%) say passage of the plan will make the cost of health care go up while 23% say it will make costs go down. In August, 52% thought the plan would lead to higher costs, and just 17% thought it would achieve the stated goal of lowering costs.

From the recent Rasmussen poll.


Right now there's so much fear, uncertainty, and doubt flying around that there's actually a 17 point swing between "Obama's plan" and the pollster describing the points which Obama desires in such a plan. Much how there was a whole lot of the "have you read the bill?!?" in the townhall meetings before there was any bill to be voted upon. So you have to be careful in how opinion polls are phrased in order to get accurate results.

When you take the aggregate of the various polls out there, there are correlations between support for Obama in the general election (ie, people who voted Democratic) and poverty levels (separate from those who voted for Obama) with support for a public option. You can see where the numbers fall in the link below. Regardless, a plurality of Americans are in favor of the public option - neither one crosses 50% (as there's a number of undecideds), but more are in favor than opposed when you consider neutral-asked questions instead of loaded ones.

As-is, there's roughly 56 votes for the public option in the Senate right now, just not in the finance committee. The finalized bill between the House and Senate versions will most likely include some form of a public option, probably something close to what was in Schumer's Amendment.
Link
Reply to message
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan - 29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM 1032 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts - 29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM 734 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped..... - 29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM 750 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased - 29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM 847 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM 748 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind - 29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM 925 Views
From a government employee: Nice post *NM* - 29/09/2009 10:17:48 PM 331 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM 693 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said - 29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM 800 Views
the difference is the focus of the organizations - 29/09/2009 11:44:56 PM 817 Views
Re: the difference is the focus of the organizations - 30/09/2009 12:40:38 AM 818 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM 797 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO - 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM 785 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM* - 30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM 326 Views
That's indisbutable - 30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM 781 Views
And that's all I'm saying - 30/09/2009 07:08:04 PM 727 Views
Re: And that's all I'm saying - 01/10/2009 03:10:02 AM 780 Views
It doesn't work at all - 30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM 823 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care - 30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM 827 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice - 30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM 687 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance - 30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM 742 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes. - 30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM 685 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health - 29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM 853 Views
Yes, it's comforting to see that we are only rated 37th... - 29/09/2009 11:14:33 PM 708 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation - 29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM 910 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people - 29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM 707 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references - 30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM 717 Views
i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM 808 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM 833 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM 873 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM 843 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference - 30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM 785 Views
Interesting... - 01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM 719 Views
So basically you are saying? - 01/10/2009 01:10:22 AM 656 Views
Basically... - 01/10/2009 02:52:51 AM 702 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM* - 30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM 322 Views
yes, heaven forbid we take care of our own *NM* - 30/09/2009 04:13:50 PM 327 Views
looks l;ike they found some bipartisan spirit after all - 29/09/2009 10:35:55 PM 719 Views
Definitely wouldn't want to "denigrate" Health Care... - 30/09/2009 02:46:19 PM 693 Views

Reply to Message