Active Users:269 Time:15/05/2024 08:58:02 PM
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto Joel Send a noteboard - 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM
If you're talking about a Browning M1918, the only BAR that comes to mind, there is a reason I said 'virtually all' and pre-WWII attempts at semi or auto were pretty craptacular at best.

This thread is the only reason I now know of the latter, and I am a little annoyed Browning used the same term for a wholly different weapon than that they made half a century ago. Apparently, there is a redundantly named "Browning BAR," referred to as such because of its auto-LOADING feature. As you can see from the below link to Brownings site, it looks nothing like the old BAR, which stands to reason since it has none of the same parts. It is ONLY semi-auto; again, I have seen nothing to suggest it can be converted to full auto, and instead seen several categorical statements it CANNOT, by any means.

That also stands to reason though, because it was designed as a civilian hunting rifle, never at any time intended for fully automatic fire. I am no gunsmith but, again, it is only logical a fully automatic weapon converted to semi-automatic could easily be converted BACK to fully automatic through removing/replacing/modifying some parts. I would expect it to be more difficult to accomplish that goal with one that was always semi-automatic and never fully automatic.

As I try to explain to people from time to time, a semi-automatic is an improvement on a fully automatic weapon. Semi = better than = Full Auto

Not that I had looked until about an hour ago, but what I have found so far says it is impossible. Not saying you are wrong; you know the specs far better than I,

If you've seen the specs on whatever the hell it is you know them better than I, I've memorized most US/NATO stuff and the real popular ones, but there are thousands and thousands of variations. Some would be impossible, or at least practically impossible, to modify. For most, it's literally something you could do with a file in ten minutes. But the principles are more or less the same between guns, it still varies between guns.

How much US/NATO military issue was designed as fully automatic from the outset and merely retooled as semi-auto in its commercial form (where such forms exist)? I have heard it said that "what can be done can be undone."


but there seems to be a world of difference between military-to-civilian conversions and exclusively, originally, civilian designs. Be careful, now; I am sure the last thing you want to do is lend credence to the anti-gun lobbys claims ALL semi-automatics can be made fully automatic after a couple minutes filing down the firing pin. ;)

Big civilian differences tend to be barrel twist and powder, and of course ammo type. Also the lobbyist don't interest me, anymore than their old ass-hattery about the importance of hunting. They can suck my $%#@, truth is truth. No, not all can be converted that easy of course, and some not all, but its all about the specific design.

People buying into the lobbyists ass-hattery should concern you though, particularly when it prejudices your goals, and (further) popularizing the idea any semi-automatic can be easily converted to full auto with a file in a minute or two is not, I believe, in your best interest (or mine.)

Again, it is not something I have researched much (read: At all,) but every discussion I saw last night of filing down firing pins to make an AR-15 fully automatic consisted of variations on "only idiots believe that, because it will almost certainly 'convert' the gun to an expensive club; ACTUALLY converting an AR-15 to fully automatic fire requires replacing several parts with their M-16 equivalents." The few people who respond seriously to filed firing pin arguments note that:

1) It will probably render the gun inoperable, because the pin is too short and/or narrow to reach the primer with sufficient force for detonation.

2) Whether or not it works, anyone caught trying is head to Club Fed without the need to wait for them to commit further crimes (yea, gun control! :|)

3) If, by sheer luck, it DOES work it will not produce a true automatic, but one that fires continuously until it empties the magazine or overheats and explodes in the wielders face, most likely the latter.

So, yeah, if someone turns their AR-15 back into an M-16 it will be fully automatic, but it takes more than filing a firing pin, which will not do the job, and that does not apply to weapons never designed for fully automatic fire.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
The BAR That Is Not a BAR
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1474 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 938 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 860 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 813 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 965 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1123 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 499 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 793 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 805 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 828 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 805 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 868 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 762 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 778 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 830 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 813 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 803 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 831 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 805 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 842 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1004 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference. - 21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM 876 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable - 21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM 818 Views
How many of the people I was complaining about would know that? - 22/12/2012 12:48:59 AM 814 Views
Some, possibly? I am ever the optimist - 22/12/2012 12:58:36 AM 773 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one. - 22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM 735 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know - 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM 742 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto - 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM 851 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy" - 22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM 1009 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system." - 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM 893 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now - 26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM 959 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right? - 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM 736 Views
Well I can't say it surprises - 27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM 676 Views
No one expects the Online Inquisition! - 27/12/2012 05:20:44 PM 690 Views
I've enjoyed most reboots - 28/12/2012 01:06:05 AM 632 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 743 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 791 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 713 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 885 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 935 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 533 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 755 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 472 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 861 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 656 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 830 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 889 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 830 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 751 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 832 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 751 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 553 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 846 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 826 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 770 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 739 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 724 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 734 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 475 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 743 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 459 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 922 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 729 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 728 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 475 Views

Reply to Message