Active Users:672 Time:15/09/2026 12:59:30 AM
It makes a huge difference when (incorrectly) claiming to know the text. Joel Send a noteboard - 28/12/2012 11:31:51 PM
You might also find it interesting to discover what the terms "well regulated" and "militia" meant in colonial times.

I am familiar with both but, while interesting, it is not RELEVANT unless we live in colonial times (note: We do not. ;))

Congratualations on passing a high school AP exam, so did I (several actually). yippee, that and $5 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. Too bad if my spelling bothers you (BTW spelling and grammar are 2 different disciplines). I usually use a spell checker to catch most of them but there isn't that much I can do about it, bad spelling (especially typographical error) is a side effect of my dyslexia. You should see it before I correct it. :)

I can only pray "dependant" is not in your spell checker; if it is, I urge its prompt removal. Spelling and grammar are distinct concepts, yes, but I would not call them distinct DISCIPLINES; they are closely related, and both are integral to proper use and comprehension of English. A 3 is a passing score on the AP English exam; a 5 is a PERFECT score (note: "passing"=/="perfect.") I claim no great laurels for that (it got me A credit for two three-hour English classes at UT, but since Plan II majors are required to take Plan II Freshman English anyway that did not matter much except for GPA.) The point was that I neither require nor desire your persistent remedial grammar lessons. I know what a dependent clause is, but also know it cannot change causality (if only....)

Yes, it is my position that the REASON they felt that the right of people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed is not relevant. The fact of the matter is that the amendment says that the right of the PEOPLE (not militia) to keep and bear arms shall not (not "only slightly", or "not unreasonably" )be infringed.

The propositions first, dependent, clause is also its antecedent; as such, that sets the limits and basis of the second, independent, clause, which is also its consequent. You are essentially contending half the Second Amendment is superfluous, a decidedly odd position for a "strict constructionist."

The 2nd amendment is written as an absolute, not a conditional statement. We can discuss why they wanted it an absolte. We can debat to what extent they felt that modern military weapons belonged in the hands of civillians (bear in mind that they were ok with private ownership of cannon). However, the plain text of the 2nd amendment is not debatable, it simply is.

I will meet you half way: It is absolutely conditional. :P I am as amenable to private ownership of cannon as they were: Perfectly legal and wholly subject to regulation.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1961 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 1355 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 1331 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 1249 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1423 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1608 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 746 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 1250 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 1266 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 1323 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 1280 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 1286 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 1285 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 1218 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 1301 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 1223 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 1212 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 1289 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 1232 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 1323 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1471 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference. - 21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM 1328 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable - 21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM 1262 Views
How many of the people I was complaining about would know that? - 22/12/2012 12:48:59 AM 1239 Views
Some, possibly? I am ever the optimist - 22/12/2012 12:58:36 AM 1195 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one. - 22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM 1212 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know - 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM 1195 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto - 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM 1422 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy" - 22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM 1474 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system." - 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM 1332 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now - 26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM 1426 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right? - 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM 1163 Views
Well I can't say it surprises - 27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM 1147 Views
No one expects the Online Inquisition! - 27/12/2012 05:20:44 PM 1166 Views
I've enjoyed most reboots - 28/12/2012 01:06:05 AM 1109 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 1183 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 1214 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 1133 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 1320 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 1370 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 737 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 1227 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 666 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 1279 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 1117 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 1284 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 1342 Views
Ironically, you misspelled "learn." - 28/12/2012 05:15:17 PM 1548 Views
2 commas or 4 makes no difference one is a 12D the other is a sentance. - 28/12/2012 10:55:31 PM 1182 Views
It makes a huge difference when (incorrectly) claiming to know the text. - 28/12/2012 11:31:51 PM 1486 Views
and by REGULATED, the authors meeant "able to use it effectively" - 29/12/2012 03:47:57 PM 1259 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 1219 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 1209 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 1246 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 1188 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 856 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 1240 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 1257 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 1196 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 1201 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 1198 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 1196 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 706 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 1198 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 661 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 1354 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 1172 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people. - 27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM 1160 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 1180 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 687 Views

Reply to Message