Active Users:196 Time:20/05/2024 05:07:21 PM
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? moondog Send a noteboard - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM

View original post
1a: What part of "mathematical exercise to show how bad social security is" do you not comprehend?

at least you finally admit to trying to make SS look like a bad thing. good thing joel and i are apparently the only ones with a political agenda in this thread.... :rolleyes:


View original post1b: Social security is not a pre-tax withholding SURPRISE

now that is a surprise, since the SS withholding is calculated on base salary, and not base salary after other taxes have been withheld. but you seem to think you're an expert so i guess i will wait for you to prove this one for us too....


View original post1c: Social security is already taking 7.5% (employer contributes another 7.5%) and you are complaining about my 4% (wich results in a much higher return at the end)... go figure

SS withholding is actually 6.2%. or are you adding in medicare too? they are two separate programs after all. and i am not complaining about your 4%, i am saying that you are using faulty math -- which you agreed to at the start by saying "mathematical exercise to show how bad social security is".


View original post2: And if you leave it alone, it will all be back (with a decent fund). You did notice the thing about leaving it alone for 5 years didn't you? 95% of all 5 year periods in the history of the market have been an increase. When you get within 5 years of intending to draw money out, you do different things, but this is not a discussion on market strategies. You can believe me or no, I really don't care.

yeah, if i was actually going to use the IRA to retire there is not a doubt i would have done things to get my shit in order. if i was in retirement, i still would have taken a hit, regardless of whether it was in my account for 5 years or 50 years. and the point still stands that SS is now the only thing most seniors can count on in retirement. we need to go back to guaranteed company pensions if you want to do away with some forms of SS, otherwise you're just saying you want old, poor and disabled people to fuck off and die.


View original post3: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH snort Rich family... heh... yeah, riiiiight. It is "BAD" because it is. The math absolutely SUCKS. I would damn nearly do better if the government forced me to bury the money in my back yard. Does the term "negative return" mean anything to you? If you are 45 or under, you will spend more on social security than you will ever receive in benefits. It is a bad plan. It isn't the social welfare aspect I object to, it is the waste of my money versus what it could do for me.

which makes you more of a parasite of the system than you attribute to the people who collect SS now, and who pay into it now. you'd rather see people do without SS than acknowledge it serves a useful purpose. and you'd rather make up numbers to support your case rather than give concrete examples of alternatives you'd rather see to replace social security. you should probably stop responding until you can actually prove your case with real numbers, otherwise your agenda is even more blatant than what you try to put on me and joel

"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years? - 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM 1257 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it. - 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM 694 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM 812 Views
Good lord my friend..... - 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM 737 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it. - 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM 778 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM* - 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM 409 Views
Yes he did. He has very poor reading comprehension skills. *NM* - 03/03/2013 01:07:59 AM 432 Views
I really do not think I did. - 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM 812 Views
I'm pretty confident you have - 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM 803 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme. - 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM 728 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that - 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM 868 Views
It is neither an investment nor fraudulent. - 12/03/2013 02:34:09 AM 932 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by - 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM 745 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? - 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM 764 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them - 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM 755 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return... - 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM 664 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it? - 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM 832 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM 667 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill. - 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM 738 Views
Here are some clues. - 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM 608 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not. - 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM 758 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't - 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM 843 Views
Indeed. - 11/03/2013 09:53:59 PM 750 Views
Re: Indeed. - 13/03/2013 05:00:10 PM 935 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement - 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM 624 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything? - 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM 696 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? - 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM 763 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there. - 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM 731 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM 819 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented. - 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM 760 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM 813 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM 681 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this.... - 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM 1034 Views
No loss. - 13/03/2013 04:37:41 PM 619 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile? - 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM 695 Views
spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 06/03/2013 12:54:38 AM 664 Views
Re: spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 08/03/2013 03:04:37 PM 725 Views
I was not trolling, but clarifying. - 11/03/2013 09:53:48 PM 732 Views

Reply to Message