Active Users:454 Time:16/06/2025 04:55:19 PM
Hrm. Sareitha Sedai Send a noteboard - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM

View original post
So here's the sitch:

We own a flat (apartment) with a shared garden where Evelyn plays and we hang out our washing. We share this garden with 16 other flats, although not everyone uses the garden.

One of the flats has recently been sold and the new owner is changing a window into a door that would directly access the garden, which isn't really an issue for us, apart from the fact that building works will likely be dangerous for a very curious toddler.

The issue is that she is also advertising the flat as a holiday let, meaning that strangers will have access to the garden and potentially my daughter. Strangers who do not have to provide any kind of references, unlike long-term renters, and who won't care about the mess they leave since they'll just be there for a couple of days.

We're not happy about this, and will get in touch with the owner to let her know this.

But what would you do?

How far would you take it if you didn't get a good response from the owner?


Do other people in the building have kids? Presumably the new owner is within her rights to sublet it in this way?

I suppose I would make sure I supervised E in the garden, and if people who rent the flat seem sketchy or it gets to be terribly inconvenient, I would sell and move. I wouldn't be happy about it, but I am not sure what else you could do to protect her, which seems like the main concern.

If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.

"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Reply to message
What would you do? - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2415 Views
Hrm. - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 1072 Views
Re: Hrm. - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 1100 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 1141 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 1094 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 1161 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 1154 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 1181 Views
Yes. - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 1131 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1194 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1188 Views
Quite. - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 1031 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 762 Views
Tough. - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 1115 Views
Re: Tough. - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 1044 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 1214 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 1010 Views
Re: I hear you. - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 1294 Views
Re: I hear you. - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 1079 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 1026 Views
Not precisely. - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 967 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 970 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1452 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 1014 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 611 Views
I can't see much you can do really... - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 1061 Views
Does the building have a factor? - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 1011 Views
Yes indeed. - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 979 Views

Reply to Message