Suggesting that, you know, the first paragraph should not be taken too literally - I don't seriously expect that the Republicans will start an impeachment process.

So let's see what I actually said in this second paragraph:

'Seriously, though, for me it's not really about what scary policies will he implement, because considering everything he has shown about his campaign as well as the leadership style described by his employees, he simply doesn't have the vision, the determination or the interest to design and implement any particular policy - at most he will inspire one (and torpedo others). Obviously he has some basic ideas that he campaigned on, but just about every aspect of their implementation seems to be negotiable and to depend on the last person he talked to. To the extent that significant and lasting policy changes do occur under his presidency, they will be driven by a combination of his cabinet and the Republicans in Congress.'

Hint: it does not say anywhere that his campaign website doesn't have fleshed-out policies, nor does it compare him to Clinton. So good for you that you did all that research, but I'm not seeing the relevance to my post. Especially your count of how often each name appears.

And before you start, of course one can't expect a president to be fleshing out every policy in detail him- or herself. But there's hardly any topic other than perhaps trade policy on which Trump hasn't taken wildly diverging positions, often within the space of a few days. Sure, he's always been opposed to Obamacare, but whether and how to replace it... that time when he suddenly promised universal coverage was just the icing on the cake. And even in these few months since the election, he has already sent his nominal allies in Congress back to the drawing board several times on Obamacare and other topics, without ever indicating if there is any particular plan that he'd be willing to consistently get behind and support.

I agree with that to some extent - certainly the media is devoting far too much attention to manufactured crises, intentionally provoked scandals and people who talk about other people's policies - at the expense of reporting on those policies themselves. Fake news certainly is a problem, though, even if I can sympathize with those who feel that that term is being applied in a rather partisan way. In a democracy where every vote is worth the same, I do consider it a serious problem if large amounts of people are being misled, regardless of whether or not someone with your intellect and determination can see through it.

Trump set himself apart from the pack in many ways and hardly any of those are positive except for the biggest one of all: he managed to connect with people who are fed up with regular politicians, and in a more lasting way than previous flavours of the month such as Herman Cain. He's hardly the first Republican primary candidate to make immigration the focal point of his campaign - just the first one to do so in quite that style.

You haven't disproven anything I wrote - not even the tongue-in-cheek subject line and first paragraph, since those were about implementing policies, not suggesting them on his website. Of course those will be disproven soon enough - but I think most of the second and third paragraph will turn out accurate. If I'm proven wrong, so much the better.