Active Users:449 Time:01/07/2025 06:54:07 PM
I had the same thought. nossy Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM
but there is other helpful information there, such as the lack of a squalene adjuvant, and who should/should not get the vacc based on preexisting circumstances.

The issue is whether any vaccine that contains known toxins should be administered. To my mind, the answer is that if the disease that is to be prevented is worse than the toxin, one should definitely still take the vaccine.

However, I have yet to see evidence that H1N1 is worse than the seasonal flu. In fact, all evidence is that it is milder than the typical seasonal flu. Furthermore, I believe that I and my family already have been exposed to the H1N1 flu back in late February of this year - the symptoms we had are identical to the H1N1 and my flu vaccination didn't stop it because it wasn't in the "cocktail" of vaccinations for last flu season (I only got vaccinated because my wife was pregnant).

I haven't had it, nor do I know anyone who did, so I can't say much about the "evidence."
Reply to message
Innoculation misinformation - 20/10/2009 04:14:58 PM 747 Views
I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:34:03 PM 363 Views
Re: I'd be more inclined to believe it was all bunk - 20/10/2009 04:35:35 PM 343 Views
oh yah sorry i forgot those words even though i said them in my head - 20/10/2009 04:44:05 PM 338 Views
do you remember anything of what he said, specifically? - 20/10/2009 04:51:00 PM 338 Views
he wrote an article for our school newspaper - 20/10/2009 05:03:15 PM 329 Views
Excellent. - 20/10/2009 04:41:27 PM 315 Views
Their explanation on Thimerosol isn't really comforting. - 20/10/2009 04:57:22 PM 370 Views
I had the same thought. - 20/10/2009 05:03:37 PM 357 Views
*gasp* you mean you didn't DIE???? - 20/10/2009 05:04:15 PM 313 Views
<shrug> I'll be getting it regardless - 20/10/2009 06:25:52 PM 353 Views
not really that weird. - 20/10/2009 09:13:27 PM 332 Views
I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 12:56:40 AM 322 Views
Re: I am not sure that is less dangerous... - 21/10/2009 01:08:50 AM 337 Views
In Sweden it does contain squalene - 20/10/2009 06:04:08 PM 606 Views
In the US, we're apparently not allowed to add it. - 20/10/2009 06:10:06 PM 371 Views

Reply to Message